The exynos code claimed the write protect with devm_gpio_request() but
never did anything with it.  That meant that anyone using a write
protect GPIO would effectively be write protected all the time.

The handling for wp-gpios belongs in the main dw_mmc driver and has
been moved there.

Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
---
Changes in v3:
- Totally removed wp-gpios handling from exynos code.

Changes in v2: None

 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c |   10 ----------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
index 4d50da6..72fd0f2 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
@@ -175,16 +175,6 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(struct dw_mci *host,
                }
        }
 
-       gpio = of_get_named_gpio(slot_np, "wp-gpios", 0);
-       if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
-               if (devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-wp"))
-                       dev_info(host->dev, "gpio [%d] request failed\n",
-                                               gpio);
-       } else {
-               dev_info(host->dev, "wp gpio not available");
-               host->pdata->quirks |= DW_MCI_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT;
-       }
-
        if (host->pdata->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)
                return 0;
 
-- 
1.7.7.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to