On Thursday 11 April 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Thursday 11 of April 2013 00:35:47 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 08 April 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > On Saturday 06 of April 2013 00:24:18 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > On Friday 05 of April 2013 21:54:21 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > > On Fri
On Thursday 11 of April 2013 00:35:47 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 08 April 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 of April 2013 00:24:18 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > On Friday 05 of April 2013 21:54:21 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Friday 05 April 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > I'm not sure
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:35:47AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Sorry for not replying earlier. My idea for the register level interface
> was to create a platform_device for each PWM, e.g. using the mfd_cell
> infrastructure. You can then pass a "struct regmap" as the platform
> data for each ch
On Monday 08 April 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Saturday 06 of April 2013 00:24:18 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Friday 05 of April 2013 21:54:21 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Friday 05 April 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure what you mean by a register-level interface. Something like
> >
On Saturday 06 of April 2013 00:24:18 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Friday 05 of April 2013 21:54:21 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 05 April 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > I don't think anyone ever suggested using a private API though.
> > >
> > > I must have gotten the last paragraph of
> > > htt
On Friday 05 of April 2013 21:54:21 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 05 April 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > I don't think anyone ever suggested using a private API though.
> >
> > I must have gotten the last paragraph of
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/16638
> > wrong
On Friday 05 April 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > I don't think anyone ever suggested using a private API though.
>
> I must have gotten the last paragraph of
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/16638
> wrong then. For me it seemed like the timer driver would expose a private A
On Friday 05 of April 2013 19:05:24 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 05 April 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Friday 05 of April 2013 18:39:58 Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > > Hi Tomasz,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:37:01PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > This patch adds master driver for PWM
On Friday 05 April 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Friday 05 of April 2013 18:39:58 Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > Hi Tomasz,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:37:01PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > This patch adds master driver for PWM/timer block available on many
> > > Samsung SoCs providing clocksour
Hi Samuel,
On Friday 05 of April 2013 18:39:58 Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:37:01PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > This patch adds master driver for PWM/timer block available on many
> > Samsung SoCs providing clocksource and PWM output capabilities.
> >
> > Sig
Hi Tomasz,
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:37:01PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> This patch adds master driver for PWM/timer block available on many
> Samsung SoCs providing clocksource and PWM output capabilities.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
> ---
> .../devicetree/b
This patch adds master driver for PWM/timer block available on many
Samsung SoCs providing clocksource and PWM output capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
.../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt| 37 ++
drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
12 matches
Mail list logo