Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] arm64: Use pr_* instead of printk

2014-04-29 Thread Mitchel Humpherys
On Mon, Apr 28 2014 at 09:59:14 PM, Jungseok Lee jays@samsung.com wrote: This patch fixed the following checkpatch complaint as using pr_* instead of printk. WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level Cc: Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee

Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] arm64: Use pr_* instead of printk

2014-04-29 Thread Jungseok Lee
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 5:35 AM, Mitchel Humpherys wrote: On Mon, Apr 28 2014 at 09:59:14 PM, Jungseok Lee jays@samsung.com wrote: This patch fixed the following checkpatch complaint as using pr_* instead of printk. WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level Cc:

[PATCH v4 1/7] arm64: Use pr_* instead of printk

2014-04-28 Thread Jungseok Lee
This patch fixed the following checkpatch complaint as using pr_* instead of printk. WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level Cc: Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee jays@samsung.com Reviewed-by: Sungjinn Chung sungjinn.ch...@samsung.com ---