Re: [PATCH v4 REPOST 5/5] imx6q: Remove unconditional dependency on l2x0 L2 cache support

2011-12-15 Thread Dave Martin
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:54:15AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:46:20AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:02:20AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 03:01:19PM +, Dave Martin wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:05:04PM

Re: [PATCH v4 REPOST 5/5] imx6q: Remove unconditional dependency on l2x0 L2 cache support

2011-12-14 Thread Richard Zhao
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:46:20AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:02:20AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 03:01:19PM +, Dave Martin wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:05:04PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 09:26:24PM

Re: [PATCH v4 REPOST 5/5] imx6q: Remove unconditional dependency on l2x0 L2 cache support

2011-12-14 Thread Shawn Guo
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:02:20AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 03:01:19PM +, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:05:04PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 09:26:24PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > > > Sorry for

Re: [PATCH v4 REPOST 5/5] imx6q: Remove unconditional dependency on l2x0 L2 cache support

2011-12-14 Thread Richard Zhao
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 03:01:19PM +, Dave Martin wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:05:04PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 09:26:24PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > Sorry for that I did not look into previous post to point it out. > > > > > > On W

Re: [PATCH v4 REPOST 5/5] imx6q: Remove unconditional dependency on l2x0 L2 cache support

2011-12-14 Thread Dave Martin
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:05:04PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 09:26:24PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > Sorry for that I did not look into previous post to point it out. > > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:39:41AM +, Dave Martin wrote: > > > The i.MX6 Qu

Re: [PATCH v4 REPOST 5/5] imx6q: Remove unconditional dependency on l2x0 L2 cache support

2011-12-14 Thread Richard Zhao
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 09:26:24PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Sorry for that I did not look into previous post to point it out. > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:39:41AM +, Dave Martin wrote: > > The i.MX6 Quad SoC will work without the l2x0 L2 cache controller > > support built into

Re: [PATCH v4 REPOST 5/5] imx6q: Remove unconditional dependency on l2x0 L2 cache support

2011-12-14 Thread Shawn Guo
Hi Dave, Sorry for that I did not look into previous post to point it out. On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:39:41AM +, Dave Martin wrote: > The i.MX6 Quad SoC will work without the l2x0 L2 cache controller > support built into the kernel, so this patch removes the dependency > on CACHE_L2X0 and sel

[PATCH v4 REPOST 5/5] imx6q: Remove unconditional dependency on l2x0 L2 cache support

2011-12-14 Thread Dave Martin
The i.MX6 Quad SoC will work without the l2x0 L2 cache controller support built into the kernel, so this patch removes the dependency on CACHE_L2X0 and selects MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0 instead. This makes the l2x0 support optional, so that it can be turned off when desired for debugging purposes etc.