Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree

2012-07-12 Thread Thomas Abraham
On 11 July 2012 23:30, Thomas Abraham thomas.abra...@linaro.org wrote: On 11 July 2012 23:19, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:10:59PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: Changes since v4: - Includes the missing gpio request for slave select line gpio

RE: [PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree

2012-07-12 Thread Kukjin Kim
Thomas Abraham wrote: On 11 July 2012 23:19, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:10:59PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: Changes since v4: - Includes the missing gpio request for slave select line gpio as suggested by Mark Brown. These

Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree

2012-07-12 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 06:11:05PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: And Mark, this touches various samsung stuff in arch/arm/ so if you're ok, I'd like to pick this up in samsung tree. We don't want to see conflicts... Well, simple conflicts aren't that big a deal... However, Thomas mentioned that in

Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree

2012-07-12 Thread Thomas Abraham
On 12 July 2012 18:32, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 06:11:05PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: And Mark, this touches various samsung stuff in arch/arm/ so if you're ok, I'd like to pick this up in samsung tree. We don't want to see conflicts...

Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree

2012-07-12 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 07:13:37PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: On 12 July 2012 18:32, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote: Well, simple conflicts aren't that big a deal... However, Thomas mentioned that in order to test this he merged the SPI tree into your tree so

Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree

2012-07-12 Thread Kukjin Kim
On 07/13/12 01:16, Mark Brown wrote: On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 07:13:37PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: On 12 July 2012 18:32, Mark Brownbroo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote: Well, simple conflicts aren't that big a deal... However, Thomas mentioned that in order to test this he merged

[PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree

2012-07-11 Thread Thomas Abraham
Changes since v4: - Includes the missing gpio request for slave select line gpio as suggested by Mark Brown. Changes since v3: - Fixed the build breakage after applying 3rd patch in this series (which had dependency on the 6th patch). This was reported by Doug Anderson. Changes since v2: -

Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree

2012-07-11 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:10:59PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: Changes since v4: - Includes the missing gpio request for slave select line gpio as suggested by Mark Brown. These looked OK (and have had quite a bit of review already so we're probably at the stage where incremental fixes are

Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree

2012-07-11 Thread Thomas Abraham
On 11 July 2012 23:19, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:10:59PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: Changes since v4: - Includes the missing gpio request for slave select line gpio as suggested by Mark Brown. These looked OK (and have had quite a