Hi Laurent,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 03:03:57PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Monday 26 January 2015 12:00:59 Joerg Roedel wrote:
My plan is to make IOMMU groups mandatory. I am currently preparing and
RFC patch-set to introduce default-domains (which will be per group). So
when all
Hi Joerg,
On Monday 26 January 2015 12:00:59 Joerg Roedel wrote:
Hi Laurent,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 05:38:22PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
IOMMU groups still seem a bit unclear to me. Will Deacon has nicely
explained what they represent in
Hi Laurent,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 05:38:22PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
IOMMU groups still seem a bit unclear to me. Will Deacon has nicely explained
what they represent in
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-December/310816.html.
The IOMMU core doesn't make
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:00:59AM +, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 05:38:22PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
IOMMU groups still seem a bit unclear to me. Will Deacon has nicely
explained
what they represent in
Hello,
On 2015-01-26 12:00, Joerg Roedel wrote:
Hi Laurent,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 05:38:22PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
IOMMU groups still seem a bit unclear to me. Will Deacon has nicely explained
what they represent in
The driver doesn't need to do anything important in device add/remove
callbacks, because initialization will be done from device-tree specific
callbacks added later. IOMMU groups created by current code were never
used.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com
---
