On Mon, 02 Nov 2015, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 02/11/2015 at 08:46:21 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
> > On 02.11.2015 02:40, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > On 30/10/2015 at 11:55:34 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote :
> > >> RTC found in s2mps15 is almost same as one found on s2mps13
> > >> with
On 02/11/2015 at 09:03:59 +, Lee Jones wrote :
> > > I think you cannot apply it directly because it depends on headers from
> > > patch 2/4. It won't build.
> > >
> >
> > Yeah, this depends on the mfd tree. I don't thin Lee applied patch 2/4
> > yet so I'm taking that one for 4.5.
>
> I
On Mon, 02 Nov 2015, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 02/11/2015 at 09:03:59 +, Lee Jones wrote :
> > > > I think you cannot apply it directly because it depends on headers from
> > > > patch 2/4. It won't build.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yeah, this depends on the mfd tree. I don't thin Lee applied
On 30/10/2015 at 11:55:34 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote :
> RTC found in s2mps15 is almost same as one found on s2mps13
> with few differences in RTC_UPDATE register fields, like:
> 1> Bit[4] and Bit[1] are reversed
>- On s2mps13
> WUDR -> bit[4], AUDR -> bit[1]
>- On s2mps15
>
On 02/11/2015 at 08:46:21 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
> On 02.11.2015 02:40, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 30/10/2015 at 11:55:34 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote :
> >> RTC found in s2mps15 is almost same as one found on s2mps13
> >> with few differences in RTC_UPDATE register fields, like:
> >>
On 02.11.2015 02:40, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 30/10/2015 at 11:55:34 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote :
>> RTC found in s2mps15 is almost same as one found on s2mps13
>> with few differences in RTC_UPDATE register fields, like:
>> 1> Bit[4] and Bit[1] are reversed
>>- On s2mps13
>> WUDR
On 30.10.2015 15:25, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> RTC found in s2mps15 is almost same as one found on s2mps13
> with few differences in RTC_UPDATE register fields, like:
> 1> Bit[4] and Bit[1] are reversed
>- On s2mps13
> WUDR -> bit[4], AUDR -> bit[1]
>- On s2mps15
> WUDR ->
RTC found in s2mps15 is almost same as one found on s2mps13
with few differences in RTC_UPDATE register fields, like:
1> Bit[4] and Bit[1] are reversed
- On s2mps13
WUDR -> bit[4], AUDR -> bit[1]
- On s2mps15
WUDR -> bit[1], AUDR -> bit[4]
2> In case of s2mps13, for alarm
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> RTC found in s2mps15 is almost same as one found on s2mps13
> with few differences in RTC_UPDATE register fields, like:
> 1> Bit[4] and Bit[1] are reversed
>- On s2mps13
> WUDR -> bit[4], AUDR -> bit[1]
>- On s2mps15
> WUDR ->
Hi Krzysztof,
On 10/30/2015 02:08 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 30.10.2015 15:25, Alim Akhtar wrote:
RTC found in s2mps15 is almost same as one found on s2mps13
with few differences in RTC_UPDATE register fields, like:
1> Bit[4] and Bit[1] are reversed
- On s2mps13
WUDR ->
10 matches
Mail list logo