Hi Pankaj,
Am Dienstag, 30. September 2014, 09:33:38 schrieb Pankaj Dubey:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, September 29, 2014 9:38 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote,
>
> > Am Montag, 29. September 2014, 14:17:38 schrieb Pankaj Dubey:
> > > Currently a syscon entity can be only registered directly through a
> > > pla
Hi Pankaj,
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:33:38 +0530
Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, September 29, 2014 9:38 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote,
> > Am Montag, 29. September 2014, 14:17:38 schrieb Pankaj Dubey:
> > > Currently a syscon entity can be only registered directly through a
> > > platform devi
Hi,
On Monday, September 29, 2014 9:38 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote,
> Am Montag, 29. September 2014, 14:17:38 schrieb Pankaj Dubey:
> > Currently a syscon entity can be only registered directly through a
> > platform device that binds to a dedicated syscon driver. However in
> > certain use cases it i
Am Montag, 29. September 2014, 14:17:38 schrieb Pankaj Dubey:
> Currently a syscon entity can be only registered directly through a
> platform device that binds to a dedicated syscon driver. However in
> certain use cases it is desirable to make a device used with another
> driver a syscon interfac
On Monday 29 September 2014 14:17:38 Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> Currently a syscon entity can be only registered directly through a
> platform device that binds to a dedicated syscon driver. However in
> certain use cases it is desirable to make a device used with another
> driver a syscon interface pro
Currently a syscon entity can be only registered directly through a
platform device that binds to a dedicated syscon driver. However in
certain use cases it is desirable to make a device used with another
driver a syscon interface provider.
For example, certain SoCs (e.g. Exynos) contain system co