On 2013-02-11 11:31, Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
> Ok, so what about a compromise which I think would work for "both" HWs
> ... we allow the "configure" operation during video on, then each HW
> driver could decide if this means you have to stop or not to do the
> changes required. But then it is also
On 02/11/2013 09:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 2013-02-08 16:54, Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
On 02/08/2013 03:02 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 2013-02-08 15:28, Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
When we do that we stop->setup->start during blanking. So our "DSS" is
optimized to be able to do that without
On 2013-02-08 16:54, Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 03:02 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On 2013-02-08 15:28, Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
>>
>>> When we do that we stop->setup->start during blanking. So our "DSS" is
>>> optimized to be able to do that without getting blocked. All DSI video
>>> m
On 02/08/2013 03:02 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 2013-02-08 15:28, Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
When we do that we stop->setup->start during blanking. So our "DSS" is
optimized to be able to do that without getting blocked. All DSI video
mode panels (and DPI) products we have done so far have not ha
On 2013-02-08 15:28, Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
> When we do that we stop->setup->start during blanking. So our "DSS" is
> optimized to be able to do that without getting blocked. All DSI video
> mode panels (and DPI) products we have done so far have not had any
> issue with that (as long as DSI HS
On 02/08/2013 02:04 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 2013-02-08 14:40, Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
I agree, but I think it should be
setup->enable->video_on->video_off->disable->setup->...
I don't think there is any interface parameters that should be changed
while link is enabled. And if there are, th
On 2013-02-08 14:40, Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
> I agree, but I think it should be
> setup->enable->video_on->video_off->disable->setup->...
> I don't think there is any interface parameters that should be changed
> while link is enabled. And if there are, they should be identified and
> split out i
On 02/08/2013 12:40 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Hi,
On 2013-02-03 21:17, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Laurent,
On Saturday 02 of February 2013 11:39:59 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Tomasz,
Thank you for your RFC.
On Wednesday 30 January 2013 16:38:59 Tomasz Figa wrote:
Changes done to Tomi's edition
Hi,
On 2013-02-03 21:17, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> On Saturday 02 of February 2013 11:39:59 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Hi Tomasz,
>>
>> Thank you for your RFC.
>>
>> On Wednesday 30 January 2013 16:38:59 Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> Changes done to Tomi's edition of CDF:
>>> - Replaced set
Hi Laurent,
On Saturday 02 of February 2013 11:39:59 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> Thank you for your RFC.
>
> On Wednesday 30 January 2013 16:38:59 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After pretty long time of trying to adapt Exynos-specific DSI display
> > support to Common Display
Hi Tomasz,
Thank you for your RFC.
On Wednesday 30 January 2013 16:38:59 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After pretty long time of trying to adapt Exynos-specific DSI display
> support to Common Display Framework I'm ready to show some preliminary RFC
> patches. This series shows some ideas for CDF
Hi,
After pretty long time of trying to adapt Exynos-specific DSI display support
to Common Display Framework I'm ready to show some preliminary RFC patches.
This series shows some ideas for CDF that came to my mind during my work,
some changes based on comments received by Tomi's edition of CDF a
12 matches
Mail list logo
