Hi Sekhar,
+
+ codec at 1100 {
+ samsung,mfc-r = 0x4300 0x80;
+ samsung,mfc-l = 0x5100 0x80;
+ };
How are these addresses determined? Are they defined by hardware (so they are
not user configurable) or is the user free to choose them
Arun Kumar K arun.kk at samsung.com writes:
This patch adds device tree entry for MFC v6 in the Exynos5
SoC. Makes the required changes in the clock files and adds
MFC to the DT device list.
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi ch.naveen at samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K
Hi Arun,
On 2012년 09월 28일 02:09, Arun Kumar K wrote:
This patch adds device tree entry for MFC v6 in the Exynos5
SoC. Makes the required changes in the clock files and adds
MFC to the DT device list.
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi ch.nav...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K
Hi Seungwoo Kim,
Thank you for the review.
+
+ /* Reserve memory for MFC only if it's available */
+ mfc_mem.compatible = samsung,mfc-v6;
+ if (of_scan_flat_dt(s5p_fdt_find_mfc_mem, mfc_mem))
of_scan_flat_dt() is called but it does not have __init on its
definition. So this
Arun Kumar K wrote:
This patch adds device tree entry for MFC v6 in the Exynos5
SoC. Makes the required changes in the clock files and adds
MFC to the DT device list.
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi ch.nav...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K arun...@samsung.com
---
On 10/23/12 19:12, Arun Kumar K wrote:
Hi Seungwoo Kim,
Thank you for the review.
+
+ /* Reserve memory for MFC only if it's available */
+ mfc_mem.compatible = samsung,mfc-v6;
+ if (of_scan_flat_dt(s5p_fdt_find_mfc_mem,mfc_mem))
of_scan_flat_dt() is called but it does not have
Hi all,
Any comments / acks on this?
Regards
Arun
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Arun Kumar K arun...@samsung.com wrote:
This patch adds device tree entry for MFC v6 in the Exynos5
SoC. Makes the required changes in the clock files and adds
MFC to the DT device list.
Signed-off-by:
