Doug,
Looks good to me except for minor comment.
On Sat, August 10, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
> If the WAKEUP_INT is asserted at wakeup and not cleared, we'll end up
> looping around forever. This has been seen to happen on exynos5420
> silicon despite the fact that we haven't enabled any wakeup
Fabio,
Thanks for your review.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>
>> +#else
>> +#define dw_mci_exynos_suspend NULL
>> +#define dw_mci_exynos_resume NULL
>> +#define dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq NULL
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> +#else
> +#define dw_mci_exynos_suspend NULL
> +#define dw_mci_exynos_resume NULL
> +#define dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq NULL
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
You could avoid this else block if you use 'static SIMPLE_DEV
