[...]
I guess we do need it for 3.18, but when we are talking about 3.19,
before we make any more changes can we outline how power domains are
supposed to work?
1. How do we attach a device to power domain? Right now it seems that
individual buses are responsible for attaching their devices
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 04:18:50PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
I guess we do need it for 3.18, but when we are talking about 3.19,
before we make any more changes can we outline how power domains are
supposed to work?
1. How do we attach a device to power domain? Right now it
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:32:24AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
- I do not see why sirincling platform specific code around i2c, spi,
etc bus code (which is not platform-specific) is OK, but a no-no for
the driver ocre.
sirincling? In the case of I2C and SPI the buses don't define any
On November 10, 2014 11:39:31 AM PST, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:32:24AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
- I do not see why sirincling platform specific code around i2c, spi,
etc bus code (which is not platform-specific) is OK, but a no-no
for
the driver
On 07/11/14 14:27, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
To handle things more properly in the generic PM domain, let's change
the default initial value of the need_restore flag to reflect that the
state is unknown. As soon as some of the runtime PM callbacks gets
invoked, update the initial value
Ulf Hansson ulf.hans...@linaro.org writes:
The initial state of the device's need_restore flag should'nt depend on
the current state of the PM domain. For example it should be perfectly
valid to attach an inactive device to a powered PM domain.
The pm_genpd_dev_need_restore() API allow us to
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:47:53AM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Ulf Hansson ulf.hans...@linaro.org writes:
The initial state of the device's need_restore flag should'nt depend on
the current state of the PM domain. For example it should be perfectly
valid to attach an inactive device to a
Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:47:53AM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Ulf Hansson ulf.hans...@linaro.org writes:
The initial state of the device's need_restore flag should'nt depend on
the current state of the PM domain. For example it should be
On Friday, November 07, 2014 02:27:27 PM Ulf Hansson wrote:
The initial state of the device's need_restore flag should'nt depend on
the current state of the PM domain. For example it should be perfectly
valid to attach an inactive device to a powered PM domain.
The
