Hi Mans,
On ven., oct. 09 2015, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> This passes a data pointer specified in the sched_clock_register()
> call to the read callback allowing simpler implementations thereof.
>
> In this patch, existing uses of this interface are simply updated
> with a null
Mans,
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> This passes a data pointer specified in the sched_clock_register()
> call to the read callback allowing simpler implementations thereof.
>
> In this patch, existing uses of this interface are simply updated
> with a null pointer.
I can't see any
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 01:42:47AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Russell King - ARM Linux writes:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:48:22AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> >> Russell King - ARM Linux writes:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:57:35PM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> This passes a data pointer specified in the sched_clock_register()
> call to the read callback allowing simpler implementations thereof.
>
> In this patch, existing uses of this interface are simply updated
> with a null pointer.
Russell King - ARM Linux writes:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:48:22AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> Russell King - ARM Linux writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:57:35PM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>> >> This passes a data pointer
Russell King - ARM Linux writes:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:57:35PM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>> This passes a data pointer specified in the sched_clock_register()
>> call to the read callback allowing simpler implementations thereof.
>>
>> In this patch, existing
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:48:22AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Russell King - ARM Linux writes:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:57:35PM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> >> This passes a data pointer specified in the sched_clock_register()
> >> call to the read callback