On 12/19/13 00:55, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Tuesday 10 of December 2013 14:37:13 Sachin Kamat wrote:
On 13 November 2013 17:51, Tomasz Figatomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 13 of November 2013 12:52:05 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
[+ DT maintainers]
Hi,
On Wednesday, November
2013/12/20 Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com:
On 12/19/13 00:55, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Tuesday 10 of December 2013 14:37:13 Sachin Kamat wrote:
On 13 November 2013 17:51, Tomasz Figatomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 13 of November 2013 12:52:05 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
wrote:
[+
On Tuesday 10 of December 2013 14:37:13 Sachin Kamat wrote:
On 13 November 2013 17:51, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 13 of November 2013 12:52:05 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
[+ DT maintainers]
Hi,
On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 11:27:03 AM Sylwester
On 13 November 2013 17:51, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 13 of November 2013 12:52:05 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
[+ DT maintainers]
Hi,
On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 11:27:03 AM Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 13/11/13 09:08, Tomasz Figa wrote:
As was
On Wednesday 13 of November 2013 09:01:36 Sachin Kamat wrote:
Hi Kukjin,
On 12 November 2013 16:31, Kukjin Kim kg...@kernel.org wrote:
Sachin Kamat wrote:
Since there are no board specific properties for the RTC node,
keep it enabled in the dtsi file.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
On 13/11/13 09:08, Tomasz Figa wrote:
As was discussed earlier too, status field of DT node is not supposed
to be used for
keeping an IP enabled or disabled. That should be done via the kernel
config. The DT status
is mostly to indicate the hardware status of the IP on the SoC/board.
If
Hi,
On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 11:27:03 AM Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 13/11/13 09:08, Tomasz Figa wrote:
As was discussed earlier too, status field of DT node is not supposed
to be used for
keeping an IP enabled or disabled. That should be done via the kernel
config. The DT
On Wednesday 13 of November 2013 12:52:05 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
[+ DT maintainers]
Hi,
On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 11:27:03 AM Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 13/11/13 09:08, Tomasz Figa wrote:
As was discussed earlier too, status field of DT node is not supposed
to be
Sachin Kamat wrote:
Since there are no board specific properties for the RTC node,
keep it enabled in the dtsi file.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Hi Kukjin,
On 12 November 2013 16:31, Kukjin Kim kg...@kernel.org wrote:
Sachin Kamat wrote:
Since there are no board specific properties for the RTC node,
keep it enabled in the dtsi file.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi |1 -
10 matches
Mail list logo