On 04/23/2013 04:41 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Remove the duplicated code and use the cpuidle common code for initialization.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
---
Hi Kim and Ben,
It is the last patch in the series which was not acked-by.
Rafael is willing to take it in
This patch series provide various fixes for TMU block.
First of all it fixes a problem with get_cpu_frequency() lockup at
cpu_cooling.c.
Secondly a proper regulator definition (VDD_TS) has been added.
Moreover device tree definitions and documentation entry are now in place.
Dependencies
Device tree support for TMU at Exynos4x12 targets.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
---
Changes for v2:
- None
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git
Proper description for Exynos4 bindings added to Documentation/devicetree/
bindings
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
---
Changes for v2:
- Documentation extension according to ML feedback
---
With the while loop, when i=0 and first entry in the frequency table is
CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID, the code results in an endless loop (since i is not
incremented).
To fix this problem the for loop has been chosen. Incrementing i in the for
end block solves the problem.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz
Hi Lukasz Majewski,
Sorry for late review but I am currently working on restructuring the
whole exynos thermal driver and this support of LDO can be added as
feature as not all socs support this. This is also suggested by
Eduardo. All your other patches looks fine.
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
On Thu,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com wrote:
On Wednesday 24 of April 2013 16:27:09 Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com wrote:
On Tuesday 23 of April 2013 14:03:12 Linus Walleij wrote:
This does not apply to my devel
Hi Amit,
Hi Lukasz Majewski,
Sorry for late review but I am currently working on restructuring the
whole exynos thermal driver and this support of LDO can be added as
feature as not all socs support this. This is also suggested by
Eduardo. All your other patches looks fine.
But this is
On Tuesday 23 April 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
This series intends to fix support for Universal C210 board in mainline.
Main difference from other boards based on Exynos 4210 is that hardware
revision of the SoC used on Universal C210 does not support MCT timers
and legacy PWM timers must be
Lukasz,
On 25-04-2013 08:30, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
With the while loop, when i=0 and first entry in the frequency table is
CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID, the code results in an endless loop (since i is not
incremented).
To fix this problem the for loop has been chosen. Incrementing i in the for
end
Hi Eduardo,
Lukasz,
On 25-04-2013 08:30, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
With the while loop, when i=0 and first entry in the frequency
table is CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID, the code results in an endless loop
(since i is not incremented).
To fix this problem the for loop has been chosen.
On 04/25/13 18:35, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 04/23/2013 04:41 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Remove the duplicated code and use the cpuidle common code for initialization.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcanodaniel.lezc...@linaro.org
---
Hi Kim and Ben,
It is the last patch in the series which was not
On 04/25/13 00:03, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 24 April 2013, Olof Johansson wrote:
I think we should hold off on multiplatform for exynos until it works
better, i.e. 3.11.
I think, this would be better choice for now if it's not urgent...
- Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On 04/24/13 09:06, Olof Johansson wrote:
Hi,
Hi Olof,
Can I please ask you to make our life a little easier by telling us what the
specific problems these patches solve are? What I am looking for is something
along the lines of:
--
This branch includes some last-minute enablements of DT
On 25-04-2013 11:22, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Hi Eduardo,
Lukasz,
On 25-04-2013 08:30, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
With the while loop, when i=0 and first entry in the frequency
table is CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID, the code results in an endless loop
(since i is not incremented).
To fix this problem
Hello Lukasz,
On 25-04-2013 08:30, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
This patch series provide various fixes for TMU block.
First of all it fixes a problem with get_cpu_frequency() lockup at
cpu_cooling.c.
Secondly a proper regulator definition (VDD_TS) has been added.
Moreover device tree definitions
Amit, Lukasz,
On 25-04-2013 09:29, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Hi Amit,
Hi Lukasz Majewski,
Sorry for late review but I am currently working on restructuring the
whole exynos thermal driver and this support of LDO can be added as
feature as not all socs support this. This is also suggested by
On 25-04-2013 08:30, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Device tree support for TMU at Exynos4x12 targets.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
This patch looks good to me:
Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin eduardo.valen...@ti.com
---
On 25-04-2013 08:30, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Proper description for Exynos4 bindings added to Documentation/devicetree/
bindings
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
I am fine with this one too.
Reviewed-by: Eduardo
On 04/25/13 23:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Universal C210 board, both with and without DT:
Tested-by: Tomasz Figat.f...@samsung.com
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmanna...@arndb.de
Olof, Kgene, I think we should have this one in 3.10 since it fixes
a regression. It looks bigger than it really is
Hi Eduardo,
Hello Lukasz,
On 25-04-2013 08:30, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
This patch series provide various fixes for TMU block.
First of all it fixes a problem with get_cpu_frequency() lockup at
cpu_cooling.c.
Secondly a proper regulator definition (VDD_TS) has been added.
Moreover
On Thursday 25 April 2013, Kukjin Kim wrote:
On 04/25/13 00:03, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 24 April 2013, Olof Johansson wrote:
I think we should hold off on multiplatform for exynos until it works
better, i.e. 3.11.
I think, this would be better choice for now if it's not
Hi Eduardo,
On 25 April 2013 21:58, Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Eduardo,
Hello Lukasz,
On 25-04-2013 08:30, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
This patch series provide various fixes for TMU block.
First of all it fixes a problem with get_cpu_frequency() lockup at
23 matches
Mail list logo