On 05/16/2011 09:15 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Shouldn't there be some deprecation period for whole s5pc100 support
removal ?
This is that. But I know, there is no time...
It looks a bit rude to me that suddenly whole support for the SoC is
vanished.
Hmm...what
On Thu 2011-05-12 10:08:06, Kukjin Kim wrote:
This patch remvoes mach-s5p6442 directory for ARCH_S5P6442 in arch/arm.
Why remove it? No users? Broken? ...?
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
Hi Laurent,
On 05/15/2011 11:10 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Sunday 15 May 2011 11:33:14 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 05/14/2011 05:29 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 17:17:10 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
snip
I perhaps need to isolate functions out from of
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:06:23PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
As we have I2C, SPI and platform device v4l subdevs ideally those buses should
support Runtime PM.
They all do so.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to
