Re: [PATCH 02/12] ARM: restart: S3C64XX: use new restart hook

2012-01-03 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:48:26PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/include/mach/system.h b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/include/mach/system.h index d8ca578..353ed43 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/include/mach/system.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/include/mach/system.h

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] lcd: platform-lcd: Add lcd panel and device tree support

2012-01-03 Thread Thomas Abraham
Hi Lars, On 3 January 2012 14:36, Lars-Peter Clausen l...@metafoo.de wrote: On 01/02/2012 06:54 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote: The platform-lcd driver depends on platform-specific callbacks to setup the lcd panel. These callbacks are supplied using driver's platform data. But for adding device

Re: [PATCH 09/12] ARM: EXYNOS: introduce arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.[ch]

2012-01-03 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 08:54:17PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 08:01:15PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: If any problems, please kindly let me know. Right, this looks better. I'm now left with one remaining bit:

RE: [PATCH 09/12] ARM: EXYNOS: introduce arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.[ch]

2012-01-03 Thread Kukjin Kim
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 08:54:17PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 08:01:15PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: If any problems, please kindly let me know. Right, this looks better. I'm now left with one

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] lcd: platform-lcd: Add lcd panel and device tree support

2012-01-03 Thread Lars-Peter Clausen
On 01/03/2012 12:54 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote: Hi Lars, On 3 January 2012 14:36, Lars-Peter Clausen l...@metafoo.de wrote: On 01/02/2012 06:54 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote: The platform-lcd driver depends on platform-specific callbacks to setup the lcd panel. These callbacks are supplied using

Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] ommu/exynos: Add IOMMU/System MMU driver for Samsung Exynos

2012-01-03 Thread 'Joerg Roedel'
Hi Marek, On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:37:29AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: Yes, there is something a bit wrong with your kernel configuration. You get this error if there is no board selected to be compiled-in. Please go to kernel configuration and select System Type - SAMSUNG EXYNOS

RE: [PATCH V4 0/5] ARM: exynos: Add l2 retention mode cpuidle state

2012-01-03 Thread Kukjin Kim
amit kachhap wrote: Hi Mr kim, All the comments have been addressed for the Exynos cpu idle patchset. The updated patchset was posted about one month back and there have been no further comments on the patchset since then. As this patchset seems to be stable now, do you think these

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] lcd: platform-lcd: Add lcd panel and device tree support

2012-01-03 Thread Thomas Abraham
On 3 January 2012 17:56, Lars-Peter Clausen l...@metafoo.de wrote: On 01/03/2012 12:54 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote: Hi Lars, On 3 January 2012 14:36, Lars-Peter Clausen l...@metafoo.de wrote: On 01/02/2012 06:54 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote: The platform-lcd driver depends on platform-specific

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] lcd: platform-lcd: Add lcd panel and device tree support

2012-01-03 Thread Lars-Peter Clausen
On 01/03/2012 06:07 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote: On 3 January 2012 17:56, Lars-Peter Clausen l...@metafoo.de wrote: On 01/03/2012 12:54 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote: Hi Lars, On 3 January 2012 14:36, Lars-Peter Clausen l...@metafoo.de wrote: On 01/02/2012 06:54 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote: The

Re: [GIT PULL] Samsung devel-dma for v3.3

2012-01-03 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 02 January 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: Hi Arnd and Olof, Please pull Samsung devel-dma for v3.3 from following: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git next-samsung-devel-dma Its major feature is including merge of pl330 driver into drivers/dma/ and

Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Add OF support

2012-01-03 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, January 02, 2012, Grant Likely wrote: On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 08:13:19PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Hi, On Monday, December 12, 2011, Thomas Abraham wrote: A device node pointer is added to generic pm domain structure to associate the domain with a node in the device

Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Add OF support

2012-01-03 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, January 02, 2012, Thomas Abraham wrote: Hi Rafael, On 29 December 2011 03:47, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: On Wednesday, December 28, 2011, Thomas Abraham wrote: Hi Mark, Rafael, Hi, On 27 December 2011 02:14, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: On Monday,

Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH 2/3] thermal: exynos4: Register the tmu sensor with the thermal interface layer

2012-01-03 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 06:59 -0500, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: Export and register information from the hwmon tmu sensor to the samsung exynos kernel thermal framework where different cooling devices and thermal zone are binded. The exported information is based according to the data structure

[GIT PULL] Samsung cleanup for v3.3

2012-01-03 Thread Kukjin Kim
Hi Arnd, Please pull Samsung cleanup for v3.3 from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git next-samsung-cleanup-samsung There are cleanups for Samsung stuff and there is no dependency with other branches. Sorry for late, I thought sent 'pull request' this :( if

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] lcd: platform-lcd: Add lcd panel and device tree support

2012-01-03 Thread Thomas Abraham
Hi Lars, On 4 January 2012 00:06, Lars-Peter Clausen l...@metafoo.de wrote: On 01/03/2012 06:07 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote: On 3 January 2012 17:56, Lars-Peter Clausen l...@metafoo.de wrote: On 01/03/2012 12:54 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote: Hi Lars, On 3 January 2012 14:36, Lars-Peter Clausen

RE: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Exynos: Hook up power domains to generic power domain infrastructure

2012-01-03 Thread Kukjin Kim
Grant Likely wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:53:28PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: Hi Sylwester, On 3 January 2012 03:49, Sylwester Nawrocki snj...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Thomas, thank you for clarifying. On 01/02/2012 03:14 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote: The following is a