On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 01:17:32AM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote:
On 9 May 2012 22:28, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
This means that bisection will be broken - anything with only one tree
won't be able to load the SPI driver successfully until it's merged
with the
Hi Kgene,
Am Mittwoch 25 April 2012, 15:11:25 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
Am Montag, 2. April 2012, 21:28:09 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
Am Samstag 03 März 2012, 22:19:45 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
The S3C2416 has a separate second interrupt register-set to support
additional irqs. This patch adds the
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:50:28PM +0100, Sangwook Lee wrote:
struct generic_pm_domain already has a field for name. Use that field
instead of creating another field in struct exynos_pm_domain
Argh. No.
@@ -99,7 +98,7 @@ static __init int exynos_pm_dt_parse_domains(void)
if
On Sunday 13 May 2012, Chris Ball wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30 2012, Stephen Warren wrote:
No progress so far. I would suggest we apply the patch below to unify
the bindings we have. I tried to minimize the impact by picking the most
common version for each property, but if we know about devices
Hi Arnd,
On Sun, May 13 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I've verified that there are no conflicts with anything we have in
arm-soc right now, so I think it should just go through your
tree.
Ah, I based the patch on latest linux-next. That's why there aren't
conflicts against arm-soc, but there