Re: [PATCH 05/10] ARM: Samsung: Update the device names for spi clock lookup

2012-05-13 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 01:17:32AM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote: On 9 May 2012 22:28, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote: This means that bisection will be broken - anything with only one tree won't be able to load the SPI driver successfully until it's merged with the

Re: [PATCH] ARM: S3C24XX: add support for second irq set of S3C2416

2012-05-13 Thread Heiko Stübner
Hi Kgene, Am Mittwoch 25 April 2012, 15:11:25 schrieb Heiko Stübner: Am Montag, 2. April 2012, 21:28:09 schrieb Heiko Stübner: Am Samstag 03 März 2012, 22:19:45 schrieb Heiko Stübner: The S3C2416 has a separate second interrupt register-set to support additional irqs. This patch adds the

Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: PD: Fix duplicate variable

2012-05-13 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:50:28PM +0100, Sangwook Lee wrote: struct generic_pm_domain already has a field for name. Use that field instead of creating another field in struct exynos_pm_domain Argh. No. @@ -99,7 +98,7 @@ static __init int exynos_pm_dt_parse_domains(void) if

Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: dt: Consolidate DT bindings

2012-05-13 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Sunday 13 May 2012, Chris Ball wrote: On Fri, Mar 30 2012, Stephen Warren wrote: No progress so far. I would suggest we apply the patch below to unify the bindings we have. I tried to minimize the impact by picking the most common version for each property, but if we know about devices

Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: dt: Consolidate DT bindings

2012-05-13 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Arnd, On Sun, May 13 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: I've verified that there are no conflicts with anything we have in arm-soc right now, so I think it should just go through your tree. Ah, I based the patch on latest linux-next. That's why there aren't conflicts against arm-soc, but there