Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Allow pin value to be initialized using pinfunc.

2013-11-19 Thread Stephen Warren
On 11/19/2013 05:02 PM, Kyungmin Park wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 11/19/2013 11:59 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Stephen Warren >>> wrote: On 11/19/2013 10:15 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > This patch extends the range

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Allow pin value to be initialized using pinfunc.

2013-11-19 Thread Kyungmin Park
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 11/19/2013 11:59 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Stephen Warren >> wrote: >>> On 11/19/2013 10:15 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: This patch extends the range of settings configurable via pinfunc API to co

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Exynos 5410 Dual cluster support

2013-11-19 Thread Tomasz Figa
ressed) Data Size:2980168 Bytes = 2.8 MiB Load Address: 50008000 Entry Point: 50008000 Verifying Checksum ... OK Loading Kernel Image ... OK OK Starting kernel ... Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel. [0.00] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0 [ 0.00] Initializing

Re: [PATCH 4/4] PM / devfreq: Consider hibernation in pm notifier

2013-11-19 Thread Sebastian Capella
Quoting Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (2013-11-19 06:50:05) > Hi, > > Are you planning to add hibernation support to ARM? > > If so then this should be stated somewhere in the patch description. > > OTOH if you are not going to add hibernation support to ARM I see > a little sense in adding hibernat

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Allow pin value to be initialized using pinfunc.

2013-11-19 Thread Stephen Warren
On 11/19/2013 11:59 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Stephen Warren > wrote: >> On 11/19/2013 10:15 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: >>> This patch extends the range of settings configurable via pinfunc API >>> to cover pin value as well. This allows configuration of default val

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Allow grouping multiple pinmux/pinconf nodes

2013-11-19 Thread Stephen Warren
On 11/19/2013 10:10 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > One of remaining limitations of current pinctrl-samsung driver was > the inability to parse multiple pinmux/pinconf group nodes grouped > inside a single device tree node. It made defining groups of pins for > single purpose, but with different parameter

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Allow pin value to be initialized using pinfunc.

2013-11-19 Thread Doug Anderson
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 11/19/2013 10:15 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> This patch extends the range of settings configurable via pinfunc API >> to cover pin value as well. This allows configuration of default values >> of pins. > > Shouldn't there be a driver that

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Allow pin value to be initialized using pinfunc.

2013-11-19 Thread Stephen Warren
On 11/19/2013 10:15 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > This patch extends the range of settings configurable via pinfunc API > to cover pin value as well. This allows configuration of default values > of pins. Shouldn't there be a driver that acquires the GPIO that's output to the pin, and configures the ou

[PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Allow pin value to be initialized using pinfunc.

2013-11-19 Thread Tomasz Figa
This patch extends the range of settings configurable via pinfunc API to cover pin value as well. This allows configuration of default values of pins. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa Acked-by: Kyungmin Park --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt | 1 + drivers/pinctrl/pinc

[PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Allow grouping multiple pinmux/pinconf nodes

2013-11-19 Thread Tomasz Figa
One of remaining limitations of current pinctrl-samsung driver was the inability to parse multiple pinmux/pinconf group nodes grouped inside a single device tree node. It made defining groups of pins for single purpose, but with different parameters very inconvenient. This patch implements Tegra-l

Re: [PATCH] ARM: move firmware_ops to drivers/firmware

2013-11-19 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:29:39PM +, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Catalin Marinas >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:46:55AM +, Alex Courbot wrote: >> >> 2) devices have already shipped with

Re: [PATCH] ARM: move firmware_ops to drivers/firmware

2013-11-19 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:29:39PM +, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Catalin Marinas > wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:46:55AM +, Alex Courbot wrote: > >> 2) devices have already shipped with this firmware. Are we going to just > >> renounce supporting th

Re: [PATCH 4/4] PM / devfreq: Consider hibernation in pm notifier

2013-11-19 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi, Are you planning to add hibernation support to ARM? If so then this should be stated somewhere in the patch description. OTOH if you are not going to add hibernation support to ARM I see a little sense in adding hibernation support to ARM-only drivers.. Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierk

Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: exynos: Consider hibernation in pm notifier

2013-11-19 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 19 November 2013 18:59, Jonghwan Choi wrote: > Frequency lock should be considered in suspend/hibernation. These could turn out to be important logs for future. Please write with more effort.. > Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi > --- > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed,

Re: [PATCH] ARM: move firmware_ops to drivers/firmware

2013-11-19 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:46:55AM +, Alex Courbot wrote: >> On 11/18/2013 08:58 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:05:59AM +, Alex Courbot wrote: >> >> On 11/18/2013 12:59 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> >>> O

[PATCH 4/4] PM / devfreq: Consider hibernation in pm notifier

2013-11-19 Thread Jonghwan Choi
Frequency lock should be considered in suspend/hibernation. Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi --- drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos5_bus.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos5_bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos5_bus.c index a60da3c..bd672de0 100644 ---

[PATCH 3/4] PM / devfreq: Consider hibernation in pm notifier

2013-11-19 Thread Jonghwan Choi
Frequency lock should be considered in suspend/hibernation. Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi --- drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c index cede6f7..dd6947e 100644 --- a

[PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: exynos: Consider hibernation in pm notifier

2013-11-19 Thread Jonghwan Choi
Frequency lock should be considered in suspend/hibernation. Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi --- drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c index f3c2287..cd05b0a 100644 --- a/drivers/cpu

[PATCH 4/4 v4] ARM: dts: Exynos5420: Add device nodes for TMU blocks

2013-11-19 Thread Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
Exynos5420 SoC has per core thermal management unit. 5 TMU channels 4 for CPUs and 5th for GPU. This patch adds the device tree nodes to the DT device list. Nodes carry the misplaced second base address and the second clock to access the misplaced base address. Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amuda

[PATCH 3/4 v10] thermal: samsung: Add TMU support for Exynos5420 SoCs

2013-11-19 Thread Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
Exynos5420 has 5 TMU channels, the TRIMINFO register is misplaced for TMU channels 2, 3 and 4 TRIMINFO at 0x1006c000 contains data for TMU channel 3 TRIMINFO at 0x100a contains data for TMU channel 4 TRIMINFO at 0x10068000 contains data for TMU channel 2 This patch 1 Adds the neccessary regist

[PATCH 2/4 v10] thermal: samsung: change base_common to more meaningful base_second

2013-11-19 Thread Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
On Exynos5440 and Exynos5420 there are registers common across the TMU channels. To support that, we introduced a ADDRESS_MULTIPLE flag in the driver and the 2nd set of register base and size are provided in the "reg" property of the node. As per Amit's suggestion, this patch changes the base_com

[PATCH 1/4 v10] thermal: samsung: replace inten_ bit fields with intclr_

2013-11-19 Thread Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
This patch replaces the inten_rise_shift/mask and inten_fall_shift/mask with intclr_rise_shift/mask and intclr_fall_shift/mask respectively. Currently, inten_rise_shift/mask and inten_fall_shift/mask bits are only used to configure intclr related registers. Description of H/W: The offset for the b

Re: [PATCH] ARM: move firmware_ops to drivers/firmware

2013-11-19 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:46:55AM +, Alex Courbot wrote: > On 11/18/2013 08:58 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:05:59AM +, Alex Courbot wrote: > >> On 11/18/2013 12:59 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > >>> On 17 November 2013 08:49, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > The

Re: [PATCH] ARM: move firmware_ops to drivers/firmware

2013-11-19 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 05:52:36PM +, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 11/18/2013 10:30 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 05:03:37PM +, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> On 11/18/2013 04:58 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > >> ... > >>> Of course, trusted foundations interface could be p

Re: [PATCH] ARM: move firmware_ops to drivers/firmware

2013-11-19 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 07:04:50PM +, Christopher Covington wrote: > On 11/18/2013 12:30 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > [...] > > You can't run legacy AArch32 code at EL3 and have lower levels in AArch64 > > mode (architectural constraint). > > What prevents AArch32 code from running at EL3 and

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Phy: Exynos: Add Exynos5250 sata phy driver

2013-11-19 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
On Tuesday 19 November 2013 03:42 PM, Yuvaraj Kumar wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> On Friday 15 November 2013 11:17 AM, Yuvaraj Kumar wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I >>> wrote: Hi, On Monday 07 October

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Phy: Exynos: Add Exynos5250 sata phy driver

2013-11-19 Thread Yuvaraj Kumar
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > On Friday 15 November 2013 11:17 AM, Yuvaraj Kumar wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Monday 07 October 2013 07:35 PM, Yuvaraj Cd wrote: On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:21

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Phy: Exynos: Add Exynos5250 sata phy driver

2013-11-19 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
On Friday 15 November 2013 11:17 AM, Yuvaraj Kumar wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Monday 07 October 2013 07:35 PM, Yuvaraj Cd wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I >>> wrote: On Tuesday 01 October 2013