Re: [PATCH v2] clk: exynos5420: fix cpll clock register offsets

2013-11-26 Thread Chander Kashyap
Hi Mike, On 22 October 2013 11:20, Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org wrote: On 16 October 2013 11:10, Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org wrote: On 26 September 2013 14:36, Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org wrote: Fixes cpll control and lock register offset values

[PATCH v4 2/4] clk: exynos5410: register clocks using common clock framework

2013-11-26 Thread Vyacheslav Tyrtov
From: Tarek Dakhran t.dakh...@samsung.com The EXYNOS5410 clocks are statically listed and registered using the Samsung specific common clock helper functions. Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran t.dakh...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov v.tyr...@samsung.com ---

[PATCH v4 0/4] Exynos 5410 Dual cluster support

2013-11-26 Thread Vyacheslav Tyrtov
The series of patches represent support of Exynos 5410 SoC The Exynos 5410 is the first Samsung SoC based on bigLITTLE architecture Patches allow all 8 CPU cores (4 x A7 and 4 x A15) to run at the same time Patches add new platform description, support of clock controller, dual cluster support

[PATCH v4 1/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for EXYNOS5410 SoC

2013-11-26 Thread Vyacheslav Tyrtov
From: Tarek Dakhran t.dakh...@samsung.com EXYNOS5410 is SoC in Samsung's Exynos5 SoC series. Add initial support for this SoC. Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran t.dakh...@samsung.com Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov v.tyr...@samsung.com ---

[PATCH v4 3/4] ARM: dts: Add initial device tree support for EXYNOS5410

2013-11-26 Thread Vyacheslav Tyrtov
From: Tarek Dakhran t.dakh...@samsung.com Add initial device tree nodes for EXYNOS5410 SoC and SMDK5410 board. Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran t.dakh...@samsung.com Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov v.tyr...@samsung.com --- arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: samsung: Provide helper for DMA init

2013-11-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:54:57AM +0530, Padma Venkat wrote: - snd_soc_dai_init_dma_data(dai, i2s-dma_playback, i2s-dma_capture); + samsung_asoc_init_dma_data(dai, i2s-dma_playback, i2s-dma_capture); we have to initialize the dma data for i2s secondary dai also otherwise

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: samsung: Use ASoC dmaengine code where possible

2013-11-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:55:17AM +0530, Padma Venkat wrote: I tested this patch set on smdk5420 i2s. During playback audio playing fast and there is underrun error like below. underrun!!! (at least 0.061 ms long) underrun!!! (at least 0.043 ms long) This sounds like it's setting the

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: samsung: Use ASoC dmaengine code where possible

2013-11-26 Thread Padma Venkat
Hi Mark, On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:55:17AM +0530, Padma Venkat wrote: I tested this patch set on smdk5420 i2s. During playback audio playing fast and there is underrun error like below. underrun!!! (at least 0.061 ms

Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] i2c: exynos5: add support for HSI2C on Exynos5260 SoC

2013-11-26 Thread Sachin Kamat
On 26 November 2013 09:56, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi ch.nav...@samsung.com wrote: This patch adds new compatible to support HSI2C module on Exynos5260 HSI2C module on Exynos5260 needs to be reset during during initialization. Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi ch.nav...@samsung.com [snip]

Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] i2c: exynos5: add support for HSI2C on Exynos5260 SoC

2013-11-26 Thread Naveen Krishna Ch
Hello Sachin, On 26 November 2013 16:59, Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org wrote: On 26 November 2013 09:56, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi ch.nav...@samsung.com wrote: This patch adds new compatible to support HSI2C module on Exynos5260 HSI2C module on Exynos5260 needs to be reset during during

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: samsung: Use ASoC dmaengine code where possible

2013-11-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:18:41PM +0530, Padma Venkat wrote: I tried this on linux-samsung tree by applying all the patches from you and Lars. Can you use -next plus the posted patches please in case there's something been misplaced, it'll help if we're working from the same code base? I

Re: [PATCH V9 2/3] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: use syscon regmap interface to configure pmu register

2013-11-26 Thread Leela Krishna Amudala
Hi Doug, Thanks for reviewing the patch series. On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Leela Krishna, On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com wrote: Add device tree support for exynos5250 and 5420 SoCs and use

Re: [PATCH] thermal: offer Samsung thermal support only when ARCH_EXYNOS is defined

2013-11-26 Thread Eduardo Valentin
On 26-11-2013 02:07, Amit Kachhap wrote: On 10/4/13, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnier...@samsung.com wrote: Menu for Samsung thermal support is visible on all Samsung platforms while thermal drivers are currently available only for EXYNOS SoCs. Fix it by replacing PLAT_SAMSUNG dependency

Re: [PATCH] video: exynos_mipi_dsim: Remove unused variable

2013-11-26 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2013-11-15 04:52, Sachin Kamat wrote: + Tomi Hi Olof, On 15 November 2013 02:39, Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote: commit 7e0be9f9f7cba3356f75b86737dbe3a005da067e ('video: exynos_mipi_dsim: Use the generic PHY driver') resulted in a warning about an unused variable:

Re: [PATCH V3 4/6] cpufreq: exynos: Use cpufreq_generic_suspend()

2013-11-26 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 25 November 2013 19:41, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote: Currently we have implemented PM notifiers to disable/enable -target() routines functionality during suspend/resume. Now we have support present in cpufreq core, lets use it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar

Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] ARM: EXYNOS: add Exynos Dual Cluster Support

2013-11-26 Thread Dave Martin
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:58:08PM +0400, Vyacheslav Tyrtov wrote: From: Tarek Dakhran t.dakh...@samsung.com Add EDCS(Exynos Dual Cluster Support) for Samsung Exynos5410 SoC. This enables all 8 cores, 4 x A7 and 4 x A15 run at the same time. Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran

Re: [PATCH v2] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Only register for cpufreq on ARM_S3C24XX_CPUFREQ

2013-11-26 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 11/25/2013 03:36 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: On modern SoCs the watchdog timer is parented on a clock that doesn't change every time we have a cpufreq change. That means we don't need to constantly adjust the watchdog timer, so avoid registering for and dealing with cpufreq transitions unless

[PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Handle rounding a little better for timeout

2013-11-26 Thread Doug Anderson
The existing watchdog timeout worked OK but didn't deal with rounding in an ideal way when dividing out all of its clocks. Specifically if you had a timeout of 32 seconds and an input clock of , you'd end up setting a timeout of 31.9998 seconds and reporting a timeout of 31 seconds.

Re: [PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Handle rounding a little better for timeout

2013-11-26 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 11/26/2013 10:30 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: The existing watchdog timeout worked OK but didn't deal with rounding in an ideal way when dividing out all of its clocks. Specifically if you had a timeout of 32 seconds and an input clock of , you'd end up setting a timeout of 31.9998

Re: [PATCH V3 1/6] cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate

2013-11-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 07:56:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: On 26 November 2013 04:59, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote: @@ -1259,6 +1262,8 @@ int dpm_suspend(pm_message_t state) might_sleep(); + cpufreq_suspend(); + mutex_lock(dpm_list_mtx);

Re: [PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Handle rounding a little better for timeout

2013-11-26 Thread Doug Anderson
Guenter, On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote: On 11/26/2013 10:30 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: The existing watchdog timeout worked OK but didn't deal with rounding in an ideal way when dividing out all of its clocks. Specifically if you had a timeout of 32

Re: [PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Handle rounding a little better for timeout

2013-11-26 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 11/26/2013 01:34 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: Guenter, On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote: On 11/26/2013 10:30 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: The existing watchdog timeout worked OK but didn't deal with rounding in an ideal way when dividing out all of its

Re: [PATCH v2] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Handle rounding a little better for timeout

2013-11-26 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 11/26/2013 04:57 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: The existing watchdog timeout worked OK but didn't deal with rounding in an ideal way when dividing out all of its clocks. Specifically if you had a timeout of 32 seconds and an input clock of , you'd end up setting a timeout of 31.9998

Re: [PATCH V3 1/6] cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate

2013-11-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 09:23:15 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 07:56:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: On 26 November 2013 04:59, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote: @@ -1259,6 +1262,8 @@ int dpm_suspend(pm_message_t state) might_sleep(); +

[PATCH v2] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Handle rounding a little better for timeout

2013-11-26 Thread Doug Anderson
The existing watchdog timeout worked OK but didn't deal with rounding in an ideal way when dividing out all of its clocks. Specifically if you had a timeout of 32 seconds and an input clock of , you'd end up setting a timeout of 31.9998 seconds and reporting a timeout of 31 seconds.

Re: [PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Handle rounding a little better for timeout

2013-11-26 Thread Doug Anderson
Guenter, On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote: On 11/26/2013 01:34 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: Guenter, On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote: On 11/26/2013 10:30 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: The existing watchdog timeout

Re: [PATCH V3 1/6] cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate

2013-11-26 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 27 November 2013 07:12, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote: Anyway, if you did what I asked you to do and put the cpufreq suspend/resume into dpm_suspend/resume_noirq(), I'd probably take this for 3.13. However, since you've decided to put those things somewhere else thus making the

Re: [PATCH V3 1/6] cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate

2013-11-26 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 27 November 2013 01:53, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote: On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 07:56:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: On 26 November 2013 04:59, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote: This appears to be racy. Is it really racy, or just seemingly? Why does it look racy

[PATCH V4] cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate

2013-11-26 Thread Viresh Kumar
This patch adds cpufreq callbacks to dpm_{suspend|resume}_noirq() for handling suspend/resume of cpufreq governors. There are multiple problems that are fixed by this patch: - Nishanth Menon (TI) found an interesting problem on his platform, OMAP. His board wasn't working well with

[PATCH] ARM:EXYNOS:Enable ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and AUTO_ZRELADDR by default

2013-11-26 Thread panchaxari
ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and AUTO_ZRELADDR is enabled by default for Exynos platforms. Introduction of this config as default will enable phy-to-virt and virt-to-phy translation function at boot and module loading time and enforce dynamic reallocation of memory. This config is mutually exclusive to

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: dts: exynos4x12: Device tree node definition for TMU on Exynos4x12

2013-11-26 Thread Lukasz Majewski
Hi Kukjin, Hi Kukjin, The TMU device tree node definition for Exynos4x12 family of SoCs. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnier...@samsung.com Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com --- Changes for v2: -

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: dts: exynos4412-trats2: Enable TMU support at Trats2

2013-11-26 Thread Lukasz Majewski
Hi Kukjin, Hi Kukjin, This patch enables support for TMU at Exynos4412 based Trats2 board. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnier...@samsung.com Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com --- Changes for v2: -

Re: [PATCH V3 1/6] cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate

2013-11-26 Thread Lan Tianyu
On 2013年11月27日 11:07, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 27 November 2013 07:12, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote: Anyway, if you did what I asked you to do and put the cpufreq suspend/resume into dpm_suspend/resume_noirq(), I'd probably take this for 3.13. However, since you've decided to put