There are two PMICs on Cragganmore, currently one dynamically assign
its IRQ base and the other uses a fixed base. It is possible for the
statically assigned PMIC to fail if its IRQ is taken by the dynamically
assigned one. Fix this by statically assigning both the IRQ bases.
Signed-off-by:
Hello Emil,
Emil Velikov wrote:
Might I suggest that we treat this (and your follow up utility) as a
test ? I.e. use
if HAVE_INSTALL_TESTS
bin_PROGRAMS = \
exynos_fimg2d_perf
else
noinst_PROGRAMS = \
exynos_fimg2d_perf
endif
and amend the block below appropriately ?
On 20/03/15 22:25, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
This event is specific to Exynos G2D DRM driver. Only
process it when Exynos support is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjak...@math.uni-bielefeld.de
---
exynos/exynos_drm.h | 12
xf86drm.h | 7 ++-
xf86drmMode.c
On 20/03/15 22:25, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
Currently only fast solid color clear performance is measured.
A large buffer is allocated and solid color clear operations
are executed on it with randomly chosen properties (position
and size of the region, clear color). Execution time is
measured and
Hello Emil,
Emil Velikov wrote:
I fear we are not (yet) allowed to do either of these changes.
The exynos/exynos_drm.h header is (supposed to) be in sync/come from the
kernel. And changes here are to be reflected only when the corresponding
patch lands in drm-next (as per RELEASING).
the
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:40:41AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
There are two PMICs on Cragganmore, currently one dynamically assign
its IRQ base and the other uses a fixed base. It is possible for the
statically assigned PMIC to fail if its IRQ is taken by the dynamically
assigned one. Fix
