On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:39:19AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> SRAM bindings for various SoCs, using the mmio-sram genalloc
> API, are spread over different places - per SoC vendor. Since all of
> these are quite similar (they depend on mmio-sram) move them to a common
> place.
>
> Signed-
Update the documentation about:
1. Usage of PMU_SPARE2 register.
Bootloaders on Exynos542x-based boards often use the register
PMU_SPARE2 (0x908) in the same way as on Exynos3250: as a indicator
the secondary CPU was booted on. The bootloader will set this value
to non-zero, after suces
On 23.10.2015 11:01, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Exynos3250 and exnos5250 are some differences in Mobile Storage Host.
> (For example, exynos3250 support the HS400 mode, but exynos5250 doesn't
> support it.)
> Exynos3250 can perform the similar function with exynos5420 compatible.
> So this patch change
Exynos3250 and exnos5250 are some differences in Mobile Storage Host.
(For example, exynos3250 support the HS400 mode, but exynos5250 doesn't
support it.)
Exynos3250 can perform the similar function with exynos5420 compatible.
So this patch changes the compatible from exynos5250 to exynos5420
for m
SRAM bindings for various SoCs, using the mmio-sram genalloc
API, are spread over different places - per SoC vendor. Since all of
these are quite similar (they depend on mmio-sram) move them to a common
place.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: Heiko Stuebner
Cc: Maxime Ripard
Cc: Chen-Yu T
Document compatibles used on other Exynos-based boards (non-Samsung):
FriendlyARM, Google, Hardkernel and Insignal.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: Kukjin Kim
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas
Cc: Hakjoo Kim
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
Changes since v2:
1. None
Changes sinc
Exynos SoC Device Tree bindings are spread over arm/exynos/ and
arm/samsung/ directories. There is no need for that separation and it
actually confuses. Put power domain bindings under power/ and
remaining samsung-boards.txt under arm/samsung/.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: Kukjin Kim
R
Hello Doug,
On 10/22/2015 07:33 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
[snip]
>>
>> Do you know why the priority 200 was chosen for veyron gpi-restart ooi?
>
> In David Riley's original patch the example had 200:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/p
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
>> Note that personally I would only choose the "highest" priority as an
>> absolute last resort. Leaving a little extra slack in there means
>> that when the next person comes up with a really good reason to run
>> before you
Hello Doug,
On 10/22/2015 05:34 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Krzysztof,
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> wrote:
>> I think at least one platform may be affected because it used
>> mmc-pwrseq-emmc and gpio-restart.
>>
>> Look at rk3288-veyron.dtsi.
>>
>> Both of restart ha
Am Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2015, 08:34:38 schrieb Doug Anderson:
> Note that personally I would only choose the "highest" priority as an
> absolute last resort. Leaving a little extra slack in there means
> that when the next person comes up with a really good reason to run
> before you do that th
Krzysztof,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
> I think at least one platform may be affected because it used
> mmc-pwrseq-emmc and gpio-restart.
>
> Look at rk3288-veyron.dtsi.
>
> Both of restart handlers had the priority of 129 which means that the
> order of execution
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 06:19:31PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 22.10.2015 18:05, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:25:28AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> >> SRAM bindings for various SoCs, us
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 06:19:31PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22.10.2015 18:05, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:25:28AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> SRAM bindings for various SoCs, using the mmio-sram genalloc
> >> API, are spread over differen
hi Krzysztof,
On 22 October 2015 at 06:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
> On 20.10.2015 21:56, Anand Moon wrote:
>> Changes need for host controller to detect UHS-I highspeed cards.
>> Changes in VDDQ_MMC2 voltage range help scale
>> the required voltage to detect and load the microSD cards.
>
> Th
Hello Marek,
On 10/22/2015 12:07 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 2015-10-22 06:14, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> On 10/22/2015 08:22 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> On 10/22/2015 03:43 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 22.10.2015 10:20, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:> Hello Krzysztof,
[sni
Hello,
On 2015-10-22 06:14, Alim Akhtar wrote:
CCing Doug, Heiko and Enric Balletbo
To help us by testing on rk3288-veyron and am335x-sl50 boards.
On 10/22/2015 08:22 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Krzysztof,
On 10/22/2015 03:43 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 22.10.2015 10:20,
Hi Javier,
On 22 October 2015 at 14:06, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> Hello Anand,
>
> On 10/22/2015 07:03 AM, Anand Moon wrote:
>> Hi Javier,
>>
>> On 22 October 2015 at 08:22, Javier Martinez Canillas
>> wrote:
>>> Hello Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> On 10/22/2015 03:43 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 22.10.2015 18:05, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:25:28AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> SRAM bindings for various SoCs, using the mmio-sram genalloc
>> API, are spread over different places - per SoC vendor. Since all of
>> these are quite similar (they depend o
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:25:28AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> SRAM bindings for various SoCs, using the mmio-sram genalloc
> API, are spread over different places - per SoC vendor. Since all of
> these are quite similar (they depend on mmio-sram) move them to a common
> place.
>
> Si
Hello Anand,
On 10/22/2015 07:03 AM, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
> On 22 October 2015 at 08:22, Javier Martinez Canillas
> wrote:
>> Hello Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 10/22/2015 03:43 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 22.10.2015 10:20, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:> Hello Krzysztof,
21 matches
Mail list logo
