W dniu 21.11.2015 o 01:59, Anand Moon pisze:
> Commit d1cd21427747f15920cd726f5f67a07880e7dee4
> (pwm: Set enable state properly on failed call to enable)
> introduce double lock of mutex on pwm_enable
>
> Changes fix the following debug lock warning.
>
> [2.701720] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 0 at
Commit d1cd21427747f15920cd726f5f67a07880e7dee4
(pwm: Set enable state properly on failed call to enable)
introduce double lock of mutex on pwm_enable
Changes fix the following debug lock warning.
[2.701720] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:526
__mutex_lock_slowpath+0x3bc/0x4
esolve the issue. Could you test it
>> with the change again? I have no Exynos5800 Peach Pi board. :(
>>
>> For this, I pushed it to below exynos-drm/for-next branch,
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/daeinki/drm-exynos.git/commit/?h=exynos-drm/
Hello Inki,
On 11/20/2015 07:59 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
> 2015년 11월 20일 00:51에 Javier Martinez Canillas 이(가) 쓴 글:
>> On 11/19/2015 11:55 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
This series causes a boot failure on at least an Exynos5800 Peach Pi
Chromebook (tested myse
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/daeinki/drm-exynos.git/commit/?h=exynos-drm/for-next&id=e84f43e2b2c3388694b0b3a58c2c4447f1fbae7c
>
> If the issue is resolved by the change then I will modify other patches for
> DECON series. And if really so,
Hi Javier,
2015년 11월 20일 00:51에 Javier Martinez Canillas 이(가) 쓴 글:
> On 11/19/2015 11:55 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>>
>>> This series causes a boot failure on at least an Exynos5800 Peach Pi
>>> Chromebook (tested myself) and seems to be the cause of other Exynos
>>> boards failing
Currently S2MPSXX multifunction device is named as *-pmic,
and these MFDs also supports regulator as a one of its MFD cell which
has the same name, because current name is confusing and we want to
sort it out.
We did discussed different approaches about how the MFD and it
cells need to be named he
From: Thomas Abraham
The S2MPS15 PMIC is similar in functionality to S2MPS11/14 PMIC. It contains
27 LDO and 10 Buck regulators and allows programming these regulators via a
I2C interface. This patch adds initial support for LDO/Buck regulators of
S2MPS15 PMIC.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham
Sig
RTC found in s2mps15 is almost same as one found on s2mps13
with few differences in RTC_UPDATE register fields, like:
1> Bit[4] and Bit[1] are reversed
- On s2mps13
WUDR -> bit[4], AUDR -> bit[1]
- On s2mps15
WUDR -> bit[1], AUDR -> bit[4]
2> In case of s2mps13, for alarm
Hi Lee/Mark,
This a resend of series [0] that adds s2mps15 pmic support.
These patches have no changes, just collected some Reviewed-by and Acked-by
tags.
[0] -> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/30/44
Mark,
Can I have you acked-by for patch# 2/3? so that these can go in via MFD tree.
Alim Akhtar (
From: Thomas Abraham
Add support for S2MPS15 PMIC which is similar to S2MPS11 PMIC. The S2MPS15
PMIC supports 27 LDO regulators, 10 buck regulators, RTC, three 32.768KHz
clock outputs and battery charger. This patch adds initial support for
LDO and buck regulators of S2MPS15 device.
Signed-off-b
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> On 11/20/2015 02:35 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Lee,
> >>Do I need to resend this series? This series still apply cleanly on
> >>top of v4.4-rc1.
> >>I can see 1/4 is already applied.
> >
> >Yes, rebase and res
On 11/17/2015 05:12 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
(...)
>
> Check crtc_state->enable, skip if false. That's the "is this pipeline
> configured" knob. For plane/connector it's state->crtc, but with the same
> role.
>
> I guess we could check that in the helpers, but we need to be careful to
> still ca
Hi Lee,
On 11/20/2015 02:35 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Lee,
Do I need to resend this series? This series still apply cleanly on
top of v4.4-rc1.
I can see 1/4 is already applied.
Yes, rebase and resend please.
Ok will resend, but I will drop patch #1/4
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hi Lee,
> Do I need to resend this series? This series still apply cleanly on
> top of v4.4-rc1.
> I can see 1/4 is already applied.
Yes, rebase and resend please.
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> > Samsung's S2MPS15 PMIC is targ
15 matches
Mail list logo