Hello Rui and Amit,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com wrote:
Refreshed to remove the notifier mechanism as we do not have a real user of
it.
if there is no problem, I'll apply the whole patch set to thermal next tree.
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap
Hello Rui,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com wrote:
On 五, 2012-08-17 at 11:56 +0300, Valentin, Eduardo wrote:
Hello,
+
+
+1.2 CPU cooling action notifier register/unregister interface
+1.2.1 int cputherm_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Amit Kachhap amit.kach...@linaro.org wrote:
On 17 August 2012 12:54, Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com wrote:
On 四, 2012-08-16 at 17:11 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
This patchset introduces a new generic cooling device based on cpufreq
that can be
Amit,
Thanks again for keeping this up.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap
amit.kach...@linaro.org wrote:
This patchset introduces a new generic cooling device based on cpufreq
that can be used on non-ACPI platforms. As a proof of concept, we have
drivers for the following
Amit,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap
amit.kach...@linaro.org wrote:
This patchset introduces a new generic cooling device based on cpufreq
that can be used on non-ACPI platforms. As a proof of concept, we have
drivers for the following platforms using this mechanism now:
Hey Rob and Amit,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Rob Lee rob@linaro.org wrote:
Hey Amit,
I was just re-organizing the imx thermal driver that uses this cpu
cooling interface and noticed a couple of small issues here. If
While rewriting the OMAP BG driver on top of this series I