Tested-by: Maya Erez me...@codeaurora.org
Hi James,
look like these patches are fine. Can you please integrate these
patches in your tree.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:17 PM, vinholika...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Vinayak Holikatti vinholika...@gmail.com
This patch set adds following
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 Maya Erez wrote:
S, Venkatraman svenk...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com
wrote:
+static u8 mmc_blk_chk_packable(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct
request *req)
The function prepares the checkable list and not only checks if
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com
wrote:
Maya Erez wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 Maya Erez wrote:
S, Venkatraman svenk...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com
wrote:
+static u8 mmc_blk_chk_packable(struct
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com
wrote:
Maya Erez wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 Maya Erez wrote:
S, Venkatraman svenk...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Seungwon Jeon
tgih@samsung.com
wrote:
+static u8 mmc_blk_chk_packable(struct
+ if (rqc)
+ reqs = mmc_blk_chk_packable(mq, rqc);
It would be best to keep all the calls to blk_fetch_request in the
same
location. Therefore, I suggest to move the call to
mmc_blk_chk_packable
to
mmc/card/queue.c after the first request is fetched.
+ phys_segments += next-nr_phys_segments;
+ if (phys_segments max_phys_segs) {
+ blk_requeue_request(q, next);
+ break;
+ }
I mentioned this before - if the next request is not
Maya Erez wrote:
+ phys_segments += next-nr_phys_segments;
+ if (phys_segments max_phys_segs) {
+ blk_requeue_request(q, next);
+ break;
+ }
I mentioned this before - if the
Maya Erez wrote:
+ if (reqs = 2) {
+ mmc_blk_packed_hdr_wrq_prep(mq-mqrq_cur, card,
mq, reqs);
+ if (rq_data_dir(rqc) == READ) {
+ areq = mq-mqrq_cur-mmc_active;
+
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com
wrote:
@@ -943,7 +950,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_err_check(struct mmc_card
*card,
* kind. If it was a write, we may have transitioned to
* program mode, which we have to wait for it to complete.
*/
Maya Erez wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Seungwon Jeon
tgih@samsung.com
wrote:
@@ -980,12 +988,67 @@ static int mmc_blk_err_check(struct
mmc_card
*card,
if (!brq-data.bytes_xfered)
return MMC_BLK_RETRY;
+ if (mq_mrq-packed_cmd
10 matches
Mail list logo
