Am 15.06.2015 um 10:58 schrieb Linus Walleij:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote:
And because you've said that problem space is a bit convoluted and I
disagree, here's a summary from my point of view:
1. All the necessary information (dependencies
Am 12.06.2015 um 13:36 schrieb Alexander Holler:
Am 12.06.2015 um 13:19 schrieb Alexander Holler:
Am 12.06.2015 um 09:25 schrieb Linus Walleij:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Alexander Holler
hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote:
Am 11.06.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Linus Walleij:
Certainly
Am 12.06.2015 um 13:19 schrieb Alexander Holler:
Am 12.06.2015 um 09:25 schrieb Linus Walleij:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Alexander Holler
hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote:
Am 11.06.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Linus Walleij:
Certainly it is possible to create deadlocks in this scenario
Am 12.06.2015 um 09:25 schrieb Linus Walleij:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote:
Am 11.06.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Linus Walleij:
Certainly it is possible to create deadlocks in this scenario, but the
scope is not to create an ubreakable system.
IAnd
Am 11.06.2015 um 12:17 schrieb Alexander Holler:
Am 11.06.2015 um 10:12 schrieb Linus Walleij:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Alexander Holler
hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote:
Am 10.06.2015 um 09:30 schrieb Linus Walleij:
i2c host comes out, probes the regulator driver, regulator driver
Am 11.06.2015 um 10:12 schrieb Linus Walleij:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote:
Am 10.06.2015 um 09:30 schrieb Linus Walleij:
i2c host comes out, probes the regulator driver, regulator driver
probes and then the regulator_get() call returns
Am 11.06.2015 um 13:24 schrieb Alexander Holler:
Am 11.06.2015 um 12:17 schrieb Alexander Holler:
Am 11.06.2015 um 10:12 schrieb Linus Walleij:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Alexander Holler
hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote:
Am 10.06.2015 um 09:30 schrieb Linus Walleij:
i2c host comes out
Am 11.06.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Linus Walleij:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote:
Am 11.06.2015 um 10:12 schrieb Linus Walleij:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de
wrote:
You would end up with the same problem
Am 08.06.2015 um 20:14 schrieb Alexander Holler:
Am 08.06.2015 um 14:26 schrieb Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult:
Am 04.06.2015 um 22:39 schrieb Alexander Holler:
As it seems to have been forgotten or overread, I've mentioned in my
series of patches last year that, with a few changes, it's
Am 08.06.2015 um 14:26 schrieb Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult:
Am 04.06.2015 um 22:39 schrieb Alexander Holler:
As it seems to have been forgotten or overread, I've mentioned in my
series of patches last year that, with a few changes, it's possible to
let the algorithm I've used (dfs
, btw. leads devs to supress error
messages, which is especially bad if you are searching a problem) isn't
needed anymore if you have a list of dependecies (however you get it,
I've used DT because the dependencies already are all there).
Regards,
Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list
the same issue in [0]), and have looked into ordered probing as a
better way of solving this than moving nodes around in the DT or playing with
initcall levels.
While reading the thread [1] that Alexander Holler started with his series to
make probing order deterministic, it occurred to me
12 matches
Mail list logo
