Re: [PATCH] iommu/exynos: Fix arm64 allmodconfig build

2014-12-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 15 December 2014 15:54:42 Mark Brown wrote: The Exynos IOMMU driver uses the ARM specific dmac_flush_range() and outer_flush_range() functions. This breaks the build on arm64 allmodconfig in -next since support has been merged for some Exynos ARMv8 SoCs. Add a dependency on ARM to

Re: [PATCH] iommu/exynos: Fix arm64 allmodconfig build

2014-12-15 Thread Krzysztof Kozłowski
On 15.12.2014 14:00, Mark Brown wrote: The Exynos IOMMU driver uses the ARM specific dmac_flush_range() and outer_flush_range() functions. This breaks the build on arm64 allmodconfig in -next since support has been merged for some Exynos ARMv8 SoCs. Add a dependency on ARM to keep things

Re: [PATCH] iommu/exynos: Fix arm64 allmodconfig build

2014-12-15 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 02:10:37PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozłowski wrote: Hi Mark, Few days ago I posted similar patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/5/268 but no one have picked it up. Anyway the fix of yours seems fine to me. I don't mind either way, it just seemed to be easier to report the

Re: [PATCH] iommu/exynos: Fix arm64 allmodconfig build

2014-12-15 Thread Will Deacon
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 03:35:29PM +, Mark Brown wrote: On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 02:10:37PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozłowski wrote: Few days ago I posted similar patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/5/268 but no one have picked it up. Anyway the fix of yours seems fine to me. I don't

[PATCH] iommu/exynos: Fix arm64 allmodconfig build

2014-12-15 Thread Mark Brown
The Exynos IOMMU driver uses the ARM specific dmac_flush_range() and outer_flush_range() functions. This breaks the build on arm64 allmodconfig in -next since support has been merged for some Exynos ARMv8 SoCs. Add a dependency on ARM to keep things building until either the driver has the ARM

Re: [PATCH] iommu/exynos: Fix arm64 allmodconfig build

2014-12-15 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 03:38:04PM +, Will Deacon wrote: On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 03:35:29PM +, Mark Brown wrote: I don't mind either way, it just seemed to be easier to report the bug with a patch. If Jeorg is busy perhaps it can go via the arm64 tree, the issue is triggered by