Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 08 2011, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
Erase unit size of high capacity is multiple of 512KiB not 1024KiB.
Could we have some more info, please? What are the visible symptoms
of the erase unit size being incorrect, how did you realize this was
a problem,
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13 2011, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08 2011, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
Erase unit size of high capacity is multiple of 512KiB not 1024KiB.
Could we have some more info, please? What are the visible symptoms
of the erase unit size being incorrect, how did you realize this
Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13 2011, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08 2011, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
Erase unit size of high capacity is multiple of 512KiB not 1024KiB.
Could we have some more info, please? What are the visible symptoms
of the erase unit size being
Erase unit size of high capacity is multiple of 512KiB not 1024KiB.
Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com
---
drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
index b148bb1..7991ecf 100644
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com wrote:
Erase unit size of high capacity is multiple of 512KiB not 1024KiB.
Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com
---
drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 2 +-
1 files
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 08 2011, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
Erase unit size of high capacity is multiple of 512KiB not 1024KiB.
Could we have some more info, please? What are the visible symptoms
of the erase unit size being incorrect, how did you realize this was
a problem, should this patch be applied to
On 09/07/2011 10:59 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
Erase unit size of high capacity is multiple of 512KiB not 1024KiB.
I'm just wondering, what are these patches based off of? I have not
been able to connect to anything hosted by kernel.org since I came back
from vacation due to the security
