Re: [PATCH] sdhci-s3c: fix NULL ptr access in sdhci_s3c_remove

2010-09-26 Thread Kyungmin Park
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:08:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: The patch applies OK to 2.6.35.  Is the bug present there as well?  If so, should we fix it in earlier kernels?  If so then the way in which we indicate this is by

Re: [PATCH] sdhci-s3c: fix NULL ptr access in sdhci_s3c_remove

2010-09-26 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Kyungmin, On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 07:53:48PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:08:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: The patch applies OK to 2.6.35.  Is the bug present there as well?  If so, should we

[PATCH] sdhci-s3c: fix NULL ptr access in sdhci_s3c_remove

2010-09-23 Thread Marek Szyprowski
If not all clocks has been defined in platform data, driver will cause a null pointer dereference when it is being removed. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com ---

Re: [PATCH] sdhci-s3c: fix NULL ptr access in sdhci_s3c_remove

2010-09-23 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Ben, On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 04:22:05PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: If not all clocks has been defined in platform data, driver will cause a null pointer dereference when it is being removed. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com