Hi,
On Wednesday 29 of August 2012 09:03:12 Kyungmin Park wrote:
> On 8/29/12, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Please see my comments on Joonyoung Shim's previous patch...
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-May/101522.h
> > tml
> It's perference issue. some person like this styl
On 8/29/12, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 08/28/12 03:06, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> The GPEx gpios are specific to Exynos4210 and do not exist on Exynos4x12.
>> Redefine them to use the exact SoC name.
>>
>> Based on "ARM: EXYYNOS: Use EXYNOS4210_GPEx instead of EXYNOS4_GPEx" by
>> Joonyoung Shim, see:
>> ht
On 08/28/12 03:06, Tomasz Figa wrote:
The GPEx gpios are specific to Exynos4210 and do not exist on Exynos4x12.
Redefine them to use the exact SoC name.
Based on "ARM: EXYYNOS: Use EXYNOS4210_GPEx instead of EXYNOS4_GPEx" by
Joonyoung Shim, see:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-ker
On 28 August 2012 15:36, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> The GPEx gpios are specific to Exynos4210 and do not exist on Exynos4x12.
> Redefine them to use the exact SoC name.
>
> Based on "ARM: EXYYNOS: Use EXYNOS4210_GPEx instead of EXYNOS4_GPEx" by
> Joonyoung Shim, see:
> http://lists.infradead.org/piperma
The GPEx gpios are specific to Exynos4210 and do not exist on Exynos4x12.
Redefine them to use the exact SoC name.
Based on "ARM: EXYYNOS: Use EXYNOS4210_GPEx instead of EXYNOS4_GPEx" by
Joonyoung Shim, see:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-May/100738.html
Signed-off-by: