Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 05/16/2011 09:15 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Shouldn't there be some deprecation period for whole s5pc100 support
removal ?
This is that. But I know, there is no time...
It looks a bit rude to me that suddenly whole support for
Em 11-05-2011 22:11, Kukjin Kim escreveu:
According to removing ARCH_S5PC100, we don't need to support
fimc for S5PC100.
NACK
There's nothing mentioning the removal of ARCH_S5PC100 or the
corresponding bits at feature-removal-schedule.txt:
$ grep -i s5pc100
On 05/16/2011 09:15 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Shouldn't there be some deprecation period for whole s5pc100 support
removal ?
This is that. But I know, there is no time...
It looks a bit rude to me that suddenly whole support for the SoC is
vanished.
Hmm...what
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi Kukjin,
Hi,
Shouldn't there be some deprecation period for whole s5pc100 support
removal ?
This is that. But I know, there is no time...
It looks a bit rude to me that suddenly whole support for the SoC is
vanished.
Hmm...what did you think about my previous
Hi Kukjin,
Shouldn't there be some deprecation period for whole s5pc100 support removal ?
It looks a bit rude to me that suddenly whole support for the SoC is vanished.
I know at least one active user of mainline FIMC driver @ s5pc100.
On 05/12/2011 03:11 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
According to
