Hello Stephen,
On 08/13/2014 06:16 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>
> I'm worried that this file represents the limits of the PMIC itself,
> whereas the DT should be representing the limits of the circuits that
> the various PMIC regulators are attached to on the board.
>
> For example:
>
>> diff
Hello Mark,
On 08/13/2014 05:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 03:34:12PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
>> Indeed. I'll change mmc_regulator_get_ocrmask() in MMC core then to use
>> regulator_can_change_voltage() to detect if the regulator is a fixed one
>> and call re
On 08/12/2014 10:44 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
The tps65090 PMU data manual [0] has a table that list the
"Recommended operating conditions" for each regulator. Add
the information about the FET constraints to its dtsi file.
[0]: http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tps65090.pdf
I'm worri
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 03:34:12PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Indeed. I'll change mmc_regulator_get_ocrmask() in MMC core then to use
> regulator_can_change_voltage() to detect if the regulator is a fixed one
> and call regulator_get_voltage() instead of list_voltage() in that case.
On 08/13/2014 02:29 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> Please fix your mailer to word wrap at less than 80 columns, it makes
> your mails very hard to read when replying.
>
Sorry I had my wrap length configured to 80 but just changed to 74 now.
>> On 08/12/2014 11:27 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> No, that
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 01:31:44PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Please fix your mailer to word wrap at less than 80 columns, it makes
your mails very hard to read when replying.
> On 08/12/2014 11:27 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Well, I think the question is if you understand where those
Hello Mark,
On 08/12/2014 11:27 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 08:49:29PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
>> So, is adding these voltages ranges (the design limits) in the Peach Pit DTS
>> file directly an acceptable solution? Basically what my previous patch [0]
>> did
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 08:49:29PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> So, is adding these voltages ranges (the design limits) in the Peach Pit DTS
> file directly an acceptable solution? Basically what my previous patch [0]
> did.
> That matches what is in the board schematic so I assume t
On 08/12/2014 07:25 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> tps65090_fet1: fet1 {
>> +regulator-min-microvolt = <500>;
>> +regulator-max-microvolt = <1700>;
>> };
>
> No, this is completely broken and exactly the sort of thing that make
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 06:44:28PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The tps65090 PMU data manual [0] has a table that list the
> "Recommended operating conditions" for each regulator. Add
> the information about the FET constraints to its dtsi file.
> tps65090_fet1: fet1 {
>
The tps65090 PMU data manual [0] has a table that list the
"Recommended operating conditions" for each regulator. Add
the information about the FET constraints to its dtsi file.
[0]: http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tps65090.pdf
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/tps6
11 matches
Mail list logo
