;
vikas.saj...@samsung.com; chow@samsung.com; Lee Jones
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from
syscon
devices
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 23:26:22 Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 17.06.2014 17:42, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
This seems like a reasonable way of solving
Hi,
On Wednesday, June 18 2014, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 17.06.2014 17:42, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 17:32:44 Tomasz Figa wrote:
Currently a syscon entity can be only registered directly through a
platform device that binds to a
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 17.06.2014 17:42, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 17:32:44 Tomasz Figa wrote:
Currently a syscon entity can be only registered directly through a
platform device that binds to a dedicated driver. However in certain use
cases it is
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 23:26:22 Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 17.06.2014 17:42, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
This seems like a reasonable way of solving the problem, but I think
there is an even better one that we have about in the past: if we
promote syscon from a platform driver into a a drivers/base/
Hi,
On 06/18/2014 02:57 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 23:26:22 Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 17.06.2014 17:42, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
This seems like a reasonable way of solving the problem, but I think
there is an even better one that we have about in the past: if we
promote syscon
Currently a syscon entity can be only registered directly through a
platform device that binds to a dedicated driver. However in certain use
cases it is desirable to make a device used with another driver a syscon
interface provider. For example, certain SoCs (e.g. Exynos) contain
system
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 17:32:44 Tomasz Figa wrote:
Currently a syscon entity can be only registered directly through a
platform device that binds to a dedicated driver. However in certain use
cases it is desirable to make a device used with another driver a syscon
interface provider. For
Hi Arnd,
On 17.06.2014 17:42, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 17:32:44 Tomasz Figa wrote:
Currently a syscon entity can be only registered directly through a
platform device that binds to a dedicated driver. However in certain use
cases it is desirable to make a device used with
