On Thursday, December 18, 2014 11:05:18 AM Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 18/12/14 01:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> What's needed to solve this problem is a generalized way to have runtime
> > >> PM dependencies between devices. Runtime PM already automatically
> > >> handles paren
On 18/12/14 01:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
What's needed to solve this problem is a generalized way to have runtime
> >> PM dependencies between devices. Runtime PM already automatically
> >> handles parent devices as one type of dependent device (e.g. a parent
> >> device nee
On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 10:25:09 AM Kevin Hilman wrote:
> amit daniel kachhap writes:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> Marek Szyprowski writes:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> On 2014-12-13 17:51, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> Instead of using bool to re
amit daniel kachhap writes:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Marek Szyprowski writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 2014-12-13 17:51, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
Instead of using bool to restore suspended devices initially, use flags
like GPD_DEV_SUSPEND_INIT, GPD_D
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 2014-12-17 03:43, amit daniel kachhap wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Marek Szyprowski
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 2014-12-13 17:51, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
Instead of using bool to resto
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Marek Szyprowski writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 2014-12-13 17:51, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>>> Instead of using bool to restore suspended devices initially, use flags
>>> like GPD_DEV_SUSPEND_INIT, GPD_DEV_RESTORE_INIT and GPD_DEV_RESTORE_FOR
Hello,
On 2014-12-17 03:43, amit daniel kachhap wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
Hello,
On 2014-12-13 17:51, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
Instead of using bool to restore suspended devices initially, use flags
like GPD_DEV_SUSPEND_INIT, GPD_DEV_RESTORE_INIT and G
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2014-12-13 17:51, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>>
>> Instead of using bool to restore suspended devices initially, use flags
>> like GPD_DEV_SUSPEND_INIT, GPD_DEV_RESTORE_INIT and GPD_DEV_RESTORE_FORCE.
>> The first two flags w
Marek Szyprowski writes:
> Hello,
>
> On 2014-12-13 17:51, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>> Instead of using bool to restore suspended devices initially, use flags
>> like GPD_DEV_SUSPEND_INIT, GPD_DEV_RESTORE_INIT and GPD_DEV_RESTORE_FORCE.
>> The first two flags will be similar to the existing tru
Hello,
On 2014-12-13 17:51, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
Instead of using bool to restore suspended devices initially, use flags
like GPD_DEV_SUSPEND_INIT, GPD_DEV_RESTORE_INIT and GPD_DEV_RESTORE_FORCE.
The first two flags will be similar to the existing true/false functionality.
The third flag m
Instead of using bool to restore suspended devices initially, use flags
like GPD_DEV_SUSPEND_INIT, GPD_DEV_RESTORE_INIT and GPD_DEV_RESTORE_FORCE.
The first two flags will be similar to the existing true/false functionality.
The third flag may be used to force restore of suspended devices
whenever
11 matches
Mail list logo