On 1 December 2014 at 12:57, amit daniel kachhap
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 29 November 2014 at 01:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:38:35 AM Ulf Hansson wrote:
In a step to move away from using genpd's name based APIs, s
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 29 November 2014 at 01:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:38:35 AM Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> In a step to move away from using genpd's name based APIs, such as the
>>> pm_genpd_add_subdomain_names(), provide an API
On 29 November 2014 at 01:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:38:35 AM Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> In a step to move away from using genpd's name based APIs, such as the
>> pm_genpd_add_subdomain_names(), provide an API to lookup an already
>> initialized generic PM domain by
On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:38:35 AM Ulf Hansson wrote:
> In a step to move away from using genpd's name based APIs, such as the
> pm_genpd_add_subdomain_names(), provide an API to lookup an already
> initialized generic PM domain by its firmware node.
>
> This API would typically be a called
In a step to move away from using genpd's name based APIs, such as the
pm_genpd_add_subdomain_names(), provide an API to lookup an already
initialized generic PM domain by its firmware node.
This API would typically be a called from SOC specific code, to fetch a
handle to the domain. Especially co
