On Wednesday 14 of August 2013 11:21:40 Padma Venkat wrote:
Hi Tomasz,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Monday 12 of August 2013 14:12:36 Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 01:41:23PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Monday 12 of August
Hi Tomasz,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 12 of August 2013 14:12:36 Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 01:41:23PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Monday 12 of August 2013 12:34:48 Mark Brown wrote:
I'd expect that to interact badly
From: Andrew Bresticker abres...@chromium.org
This adds device-tree bindings for the i2s controllers on Exynos 5420.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker abres...@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Padmavathi Venna padm...@samsung.com
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/57713
---
Hi Padmavathi, Andrew,
On Monday 12 of August 2013 15:37:47 Padmavathi Venna wrote:
From: Andrew Bresticker abres...@chromium.org
This adds device-tree bindings for the i2s controllers on Exynos 5420.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker abres...@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Padmavathi Venna
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 01:14:20PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Monday 12 of August 2013 15:37:47 Padmavathi Venna wrote:
+ i2s_0: i2s@0383 {
+ status = disabled;
If a node does not require any board-specific properties for the device to
operate properly, there is no
On Monday 12 of August 2013 12:34:48 Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 01:14:20PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Monday 12 of August 2013 15:37:47 Padmavathi Venna wrote:
+ i2s_0: i2s@0383 {
+ status = disabled;
If a node does not require any board-specific
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 01:41:23PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Monday 12 of August 2013 12:34:48 Mark Brown wrote:
I'd expect that to interact badly with the pinmuxing - unless the device
is disabled it'll try to grab its pins on probe which is not going to be
a good idea unless it is
On Monday 12 of August 2013 14:12:36 Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 01:41:23PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Monday 12 of August 2013 12:34:48 Mark Brown wrote:
I'd expect that to interact badly with the pinmuxing - unless the
device is disabled it'll try to grab its pins on
