On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Currently S2MPSXX multifunction device is named as *-pmic,
> and these MFDs also supports regulator as a one of its MFD cell which
> has the same name, because current name is confusing and we want to
> sort it out.
>
> We did discussed different approach
Currently S2MPSXX multifunction device is named as *-pmic,
and these MFDs also supports regulator as a one of its MFD cell which
has the same name, because current name is confusing and we want to
sort it out.
We did discussed different approaches about how the MFD and it
cells need to be named he
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:36:09AM +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Currently S2MPSXX multifunction device is named as *-pmic,
> and these MFDs also supports regulator as a one of its MFD cell which
> has the same name, because current name is confusing and we want to
> sort it out.
Acked-by: Mark Brow
On 02.11.2015 13:06, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Currently S2MPSXX multifunction device is named as *-pmic,
> and these MFDs also supports regulator as a one of its MFD cell which
> has the same name, because current name is confusing and we want to
> sort it out.
>
> We did discussed different approache
Currently S2MPSXX multifunction device is named as *-pmic,
and these MFDs also supports regulator as a one of its MFD cell which
has the same name, because current name is confusing and we want to
sort it out.
We did discussed different approaches about how the MFD and it
cells need to be named he
