On Sunday 13 May 2012, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Sun, May 13 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I've verified that there are no conflicts with anything we have in
> > arm-soc right now, so I think it should just go through your
> > tree.
>
> Ah, I based the patch on latest linux-next. That
Hi Arnd,
On Sun, May 13 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I've verified that there are no conflicts with anything we have in
> arm-soc right now, so I think it should just go through your
> tree.
Ah, I based the patch on latest linux-next. That's why there aren't
conflicts against arm-soc, but there
On Sunday 13 May 2012, Chris Ball wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30 2012, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> No progress so far. I would suggest we apply the patch below to unify
> >> the bindings we have. I tried to minimize the impact by picking the most
> >> common version for each property, but if we know about
Hi Chris
Good to see this happening! Is anyone also planning to submit a generic OF
parser to convert OF properties into respective host capability flags? I
didn't thoroughly review this patch, just a minor typo correction:
On Sun, 13 May 2012, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Fri, Mar 30
Hi Arnd,
On Fri, Mar 30 2012, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> No progress so far. I would suggest we apply the patch below to unify
>> the bindings we have. I tried to minimize the impact by picking the most
>> common version for each property, but if we know about devices that would
>> get broken by thi
