Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] DMA: PL330: Balance module remove function with probe

2012-10-29 Thread Inderpal Singh
Hi Vinod, On 29 October 2012 10:15, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 15:50 +0530, Inderpal Singh wrote: >> Hi Vinod, >> >> On 26 October 2012 10:15, Vinod Koul wrote: >> > On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 16:53 +0530, Inderpal Singh wrote: >> >> >> >> This code will get executed only in case of fo

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] DMA: PL330: Balance module remove function with probe

2012-10-28 Thread Vinod Koul
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 15:50 +0530, Inderpal Singh wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > On 26 October 2012 10:15, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 16:53 +0530, Inderpal Singh wrote: > >> > >> This code will get executed only in case of force removal of the > >> module which was discussed in the first

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] DMA: PL330: Balance module remove function with probe

2012-10-27 Thread Inderpal Singh
Hi Vinod, On 26 October 2012 10:15, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 16:53 +0530, Inderpal Singh wrote: >> >> This code will get executed only in case of force removal of the >> module which was discussed in the first version of the patch at [1]. >> Now, if we do not have to think about

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] DMA: PL330: Balance module remove function with probe

2012-10-26 Thread Vinod Koul
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 16:53 +0530, Inderpal Singh wrote: > > This code will get executed only in case of force removal of the > module which was discussed in the first version of the patch at [1]. > Now, if we do not have to think about force removal then this patch > will go back to the first ver

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] DMA: PL330: Balance module remove function with probe

2012-10-25 Thread Inderpal Singh
Hi Vinod, On 24 October 2012 09:44, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 15:47 +0530, Inderpal Singh wrote: >> Since peripheral channel resources are not being allocated at probe, >> no need to flush the channels and free the resources in remove function. >> In case, the channel is in use by

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] DMA: PL330: Balance module remove function with probe

2012-10-23 Thread Vinod Koul
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 15:47 +0530, Inderpal Singh wrote: > Since peripheral channel resources are not being allocated at probe, > no need to flush the channels and free the resources in remove function. > In case, the channel is in use by some client, return EBUSY. > > Signed-off-by: Inderpal Sing

[PATCH v2 3/4] DMA: PL330: Balance module remove function with probe

2012-10-05 Thread Inderpal Singh
Since peripheral channel resources are not being allocated at probe, no need to flush the channels and free the resources in remove function. In case, the channel is in use by some client, return EBUSY. Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh --- drivers/dma/pl330.c | 13 - 1 file changed, 8