On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 13:35:49 +0530
Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 27 November 2014 at 19:42, Eduardo Valentin edubez...@gmail.com
wrote:
(I'm sorry VireshK, I am still using my normal practice) :-)
That's fine :)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
Hello Folks,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:18:24AM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 13:35:49 +0530
Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 27 November 2014 at 19:42, Eduardo Valentin edubez...@gmail.com
wrote:
(I'm sorry VireshK, I am still using my normal
On 28 November 2014 at 18:44, Eduardo Valentin edubez...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I wouldn't say unfortunately, but fortunately! :-)
+1 :)
However, I would prefer, at least to what comes to deferring, to update
the drivers altogether with the inclusion of the check in cpu cooling.
This way the
In this patch, the cpu_cooling code checks for the usability of cpufreq
layer before proceeding with the CPU cooling device registration. The
main reason is: CPU cooling device is not usable if cpufreq cannot
switch frequencies.
Similar checks are spread in thermal drivers. Thus, the advantage
