RE: [PATCHv2 1/2] arm: samsung: support the second capability for samsung-soc

2011-11-15 Thread Kukjin Kim
Jaehoon Chung wrote: In mmc, there are capabilities and use the host_caps. That capability is expressed with bit[0:31]. But now..already filled the bit[0:31]... so we need to denote with the other capability field. (if we want to use the cache, powerclass, etc for eMMC..this field is

Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] arm: samsung: support the second capability for samsung-soc

2011-11-15 Thread Jaehoon Chung
Hi Kukjin On 11/15/2011 06:53 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: Jaehoon Chung wrote: In mmc, there are capabilities and use the host_caps. That capability is expressed with bit[0:31]. But now..already filled the bit[0:31]... so we need to denote with the other capability field. (if we want to use the

Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] arm: samsung: support the second capability for samsung-soc

2011-11-10 Thread Jae hoon Chung
Hi kgene How about this patch? this patch must add the platform data. Thanks, Jaehoon Chung 2011/11/3 Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com: In mmc, there are capabilities and use the host_caps. That capability is expressed with bit[0:31]. But now..already filled the bit[0:31]... so we need

[PATCHv2 1/2] arm: samsung: support the second capability for samsung-soc

2011-11-02 Thread Jaehoon Chung
In mmc, there are capabilities and use the host_caps. That capability is expressed with bit[0:31]. But now..already filled the bit[0:31]... so we need to denote with the other capability field. (if we want to use the cache, powerclass, etc for eMMC..this field is necessary) Signed-off-by: Jaehoon