Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 17:07:54 -0700 Alexandre Courbot
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:36:44 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Monday 08 April 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 17:07:54 -0700 Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:36:44 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>
> >> On Monday 08 April 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Should do the trick, if we ca
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:36:44 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> On Monday 08 April 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Should do the trick, if we can make sure that your tree is merged
>> > >> prior to my patches.
>> > >
>
Hi all,
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:36:44 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Monday 08 April 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Should do the trick, if we can make sure that your tree is merged
> > >> prior to my patches.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure but I think, arm-soc tree should be merged into m
On Monday 08 April 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >>
> >> Should do the trick, if we can make sure that your tree is merged
> >> prior to my patches.
> >
> > I'm not sure but I think, arm-soc tree should be merged into mainline
> > before others...
> >
> >> Can you put it into your tree for 3.10?
On 04/08/2013 01:31 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
could you amend the patches that adds them such as they get changed
into "select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB" instead? You can grep for "select
>>>
>>> I can do it for my
Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> >> could you amend the patches that adds them such as they get changed
> >> into "select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB" instead? You can grep for "select
> >
> > I can do it for my tree but the branch already included in arm-
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> could you amend the patches that adds them such as they get changed
>> into "select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB" instead? You can grep for "select
>
> I can do it for my tree but the branch already included in arm-soc tree so I
> think, it should be f
Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> Hi Romain,
>
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Romain Naour
> wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > When I read your mail, I was surprised that you were speaking about
> GPIOs, my pathes for samsung CPUs are intended for timer sub-system.
> >
> > As you can see in this thread
Hi Romain,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Romain Naour wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> When I read your mail, I was surprised that you were speaking about GPIOs, my
> pathes for samsung CPUs are intended for timer sub-system.
>
> As you can see in this thread, when I send my patches "ARM: S3C24XX: Add
Le 21/03/2013 03:15, Alexandre Courbot a écrit :
Hi Romain,
I have submitted a series of patches that deprecates the use of
GENERIC_GPIO as a first step towards the consolidation of GPIO around
gpiolib. The goal of this set of to remove all "select GENERIC_GPIO"
instances and it should be merged
11 matches
Mail list logo
