On 11/27/12 17:50, Thomas Abraham wrote:
On 27 November 2012 10:31, Seungwon Jeontgih@samsung.com wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012, Thomas Abrahamthomas.abra...@linaro.org wrote:
With device tree support enabled for dwmci controller, the unused non-dt support
for dwmci controller can
On 11/26/12, Thomas Abraham thomas.abra...@linaro.org wrote:
With device tree support enabled for dwmci controller, the unused non-dt
support
for dwmci controller can be removed.
Are there no problem to use legacy board? e.g., universal_c210.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham
Thomas Abraham wrote:
With device tree support enabled for dwmci controller, the unused non-dt
support
for dwmci controller can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham thomas.abra...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile |1 -
arch/arm/mach-exynos/dev-dwmci.c
Kyungmin Park wrote:
On 11/26/12, Thomas Abraham thomas.abra...@linaro.org wrote:
With device tree support enabled for dwmci controller, the unused non-dt
support
for dwmci controller can be removed.
Are there no problem to use legacy board? e.g., universal_c210.
I cannot find
On Monday, November 26, 2012, Thomas Abraham thomas.abra...@linaro.org wrote:
With device tree support enabled for dwmci controller, the unused non-dt
support
for dwmci controller can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham thomas.abra...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
Hi Mr. Park,
On 26 November 2012 16:57, Kyungmin Park kmp...@infradead.org wrote:
On 11/26/12, Thomas Abraham thomas.abra...@linaro.org wrote:
With device tree support enabled for dwmci controller, the unused non-dt
support
for dwmci controller can be removed.
Are there no problem to use
