Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: samsung: Fixed wrong comparison for baudclk_rate

2012-06-20 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:28:40PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: Kyoungil Kim wrote: port-baudclk_rate should be compared to the rate of port-baudclk, because port-baudclk_rate was assigned as the rate of port-baudclk previously. So to check that the current baudclk rate is same as previous

RE: [PATCH 2/2] serial: samsung: Fixed wrong comparison for baudclk_rate

2012-06-19 Thread Kukjin Kim
Kyoungil Kim wrote: port-baudclk_rate should be compared to the rate of port-baudclk, because port-baudclk_rate was assigned as the rate of port-baudclk previously. So to check that the current baudclk rate is same as previous rate, the target of comparison sholud be the rate of