MyungJoo Ham wrote:
CPUFREQ of S5PV210 uses different APLL settings and we provide
such values for CPUFREQ at pll.h. We have been using differently
between EVT0 and EVT1 machines. Although this version of kernel
assumes that the CPU is EVT1, users may use code for EVT0 later.
Note that at
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
MyungJoo Ham wrote:
CPUFREQ of S5PV210 uses different APLL settings and we provide
such values for CPUFREQ at pll.h. We have been using differently
between EVT0 and EVT1 machines. Although this version of kernel
assumes
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
MyungJoo Ham wrote:
CPUFREQ of S5PV210 uses different APLL settings and we provide
such values for CPUFREQ at pll.h. We have been using differently
between EVT0 and EVT1 machines. Although this version of kernel
assumes
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Kyungmin Park
kyungmin.p...@samsung.com wrote:
I don't say LSI need to support early chip. you focus on the your selected
SoC.
The remaining will be done by us.
Of course, you can do whatever you want.
I only worry that this mindless rush to push support for
