Re: exynos boot falures in linux-next

2014-12-02 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Kukjin,

On 11/20/2014 02:55 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:

 Yeah, it could be a best solution at this moment. Let me revert the commit
 0ef76aea7a34 (ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable options for display panel
 support)
 from -next in samsung tree.
 

Maybe now that all the issues with the Exynos DRM driver that were causing
boot failures were found and fixed, we can enable these config options again?

After all, the fact that these symbols got enabled is what made the issues
to be detected in the first place so is useful to find regressions earlier.

Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: exynos boot falures in linux-next

2014-11-19 Thread Kevin Hilman
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@kernel.org wrote:
 Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk writes:

 Hello Kevin,

 On 11/17/2014 11:24 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:

 As might have been expected, reverting the change that enables the
 DRM/display options in exynos_defconfig fixes the problem.

 Kevin


 I'm sorry for causing a boot failure but when I first posted that patch,
 the Exynos DRM driver was working correctly (at least on the Exynos boards
 I've access to)

 Yeah, I tested it at the time as well, so I know it was working.

 so it seems the regression was introduced while the patch
 was posted but not yet picked.

 I'm not sure what is the correct step in this case but I'm OK with
 reverting the patch until the Exynos DRM driver bug is fixed.

 I didn't have time to dig, but I'd rather someone track down the DRM
 problem and fix that, since it was known to be working. I'm guessing
 it's something simple that can be fixed before the merge window opens.

OK, so this DRM problem is turning out to be non-trivial, so I think
the defconfig patch should be reverted until the DRM issue is sorted
out.

Otherwise, we risk having boot failures in linux-next which may be
hiding other problems.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: exynos boot falures in linux-next

2014-11-19 Thread Kukjin Kim
Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

+ Olof,

 Hello Kevin,
 
Hi,

 On 11/19/2014 06:01 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:

 I'm not sure what is the correct step in this case but I'm OK with
 reverting the patch until the Exynos DRM driver bug is fixed.

 I didn't have time to dig, but I'd rather someone track down the DRM
 problem and fix that, since it was known to be working. I'm guessing
 it's something simple that can be fixed before the merge window opens.
 
 OK, so this DRM problem is turning out to be non-trivial, so I think
 the defconfig patch should be reverted until the DRM issue is sorted
 out.
 
 Otherwise, we risk having boot failures in linux-next which may be
 hiding other problems.
 
 Kevin
 
 
 Agreed with the config revert, so many issues with Exynos DRM in
linux-next :(

Yeah, it could be a best solution at this moment. Let me revert the commit
0ef76aea7a34 (ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable options for display panel
support)
from -next in samsung tree.

Thanks,
Kukjin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


exynos boot falures in linux-next (was: next boot: 94 boots: 79 pass, 13 fail, 2 untried (next-20141117))

2014-11-17 Thread Kevin Hilman
FYI...

Various new exynos5 boot failures starting next-20141117.  Looking in
the boot logs, the boot stops during DRM initialization.

Note that the boot failures are only on exynos_defconfig, and not
multi_v7_defconfig.

Excerpt from boot report below, or recent exynos boots can also be
explored here:

   http://status.armcloud.us/boot/?exynos

Kevin


Kevin's boot bot khil...@kernel.org writes:

 Full Build report: http://status.armcloud.us/build/next/kernel/next-20141117/
 Full Boot report:  
 http://status.armcloud.us/boot/all/job/next/kernel/next-20141117/

 Tree/Branch: next
 Git describe: next-20141117

 Failed boot tests
 =

[...]

exynos5422-odroid-xu3: FAIL:arm-exynos_defconfig
   
 http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/next/next-20141117/arm-exynos_defconfig/boot-exynos5422-odroid-xu3.html
   exynos5250-arndale: FAIL:arm-exynos_defconfig
   
 http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/next/next-20141117/arm-exynos_defconfig/boot-exynos5250-arndale.html
  exynos5800-peach-pi: FAIL:arm-exynos_defconfig
   
 http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/next/next-20141117/arm-exynos_defconfig/boot-exynos5800-peach-pi.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: exynos boot falures in linux-next

2014-11-17 Thread Krzysztof Kozłowski
On 17.11.2014 16:57, Kevin Hilman wrote:
 FYI...
 
 Various new exynos5 boot failures starting next-20141117.  Looking in
 the boot logs, the boot stops during DRM initialization.
 
 Note that the boot failures are only on exynos_defconfig, and not
 multi_v7_defconfig.

Cc: +Inki Dae, +dri-devel

This came up on Trats2 board (Exynos 4412) since next-20141105:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/6/125

Disabling DRM helps.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

 
 Excerpt from boot report below, or recent exynos boots can also be
 explored here:
 
http://status.armcloud.us/boot/?exynos
 
 Kevin
 
 
 Kevin's boot bot khil...@kernel.org writes:
 
 Full Build report: http://status.armcloud.us/build/next/kernel/next-20141117/
 Full Boot report:  
 http://status.armcloud.us/boot/all/job/next/kernel/next-20141117/

 Tree/Branch: next
 Git describe: next-20141117

 Failed boot tests
 =
 
 [...]
 
exynos5422-odroid-xu3: FAIL:arm-exynos_defconfig
   
 http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/next/next-20141117/arm-exynos_defconfig/boot-exynos5422-odroid-xu3.html
   exynos5250-arndale: FAIL:arm-exynos_defconfig
   
 http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/next/next-20141117/arm-exynos_defconfig/boot-exynos5250-arndale.html
  exynos5800-peach-pi: FAIL:arm-exynos_defconfig
   
 http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/next/next-20141117/arm-exynos_defconfig/boot-exynos5800-peach-pi.html
 
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc 
 in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: exynos boot falures in linux-next

2014-11-17 Thread Kevin Hilman
Kevin Hilman khil...@kernel.org writes:

 FYI...

 Various new exynos5 boot failures starting next-20141117.  Looking in
 the boot logs, the boot stops during DRM initialization.

 Note that the boot failures are only on exynos_defconfig, and not
 multi_v7_defconfig.

As might have been expected, reverting the change that enables the
DRM/display options in exynos_defconfig fixes the problem.

Kevin

 Excerpt from boot report below, or recent exynos boots can also be
 explored here:

http://status.armcloud.us/boot/?exynos

 Kevin


 Kevin's boot bot khil...@kernel.org writes:

 Full Build report: http://status.armcloud.us/build/next/kernel/next-20141117/
 Full Boot report:  
 http://status.armcloud.us/boot/all/job/next/kernel/next-20141117/

 Tree/Branch: next
 Git describe: next-20141117

 Failed boot tests
 =

 [...]

exynos5422-odroid-xu3: FAIL:arm-exynos_defconfig
   
 http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/next/next-20141117/arm-exynos_defconfig/boot-exynos5422-odroid-xu3.html
   exynos5250-arndale: FAIL:arm-exynos_defconfig
   
 http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/next/next-20141117/arm-exynos_defconfig/boot-exynos5250-arndale.html
  exynos5800-peach-pi: FAIL:arm-exynos_defconfig
   
 http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/next/next-20141117/arm-exynos_defconfig/boot-exynos5800-peach-pi.html

[1]
commit 0ef76aea7a344ac520b02822a8080797fa06124c
Author: Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk
Date:   Thu Nov 13 11:51:42 2014 +0900

ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable options for display panel support

Many Exynos devices have a display panel. Most of them just have
a simple panel while others have more complex configurations that
requires an embedded DisplayPort (eDP) to LVDS bridges.

This patch enables the following features to be built in the kernel
image to support both setups:

- Direct Rendering Manager (DRM)
- DRM bridge registration and lookup framework
- Parade ps8622/ps8625 eDP/LVDS bridge
- NXP ptn3460 eDP/LVDS bridge
- Exynos Fully Interactive Mobile Display controller (FIMD)
- Panel registration and lookup framework
- Simple panels
- Backlight  LCD device support

Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: exynos boot falures in linux-next

2014-11-17 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Kevin,

On 11/17/2014 11:24 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
 
 As might have been expected, reverting the change that enables the
 DRM/display options in exynos_defconfig fixes the problem.
 
 Kevin


I'm sorry for causing a boot failure but when I first posted that patch,
the Exynos DRM driver was working correctly (at least on the Exynos boards
I've access to) so it seems the regression was introduced while the patch
was posted but not yet picked.

I'm not sure what is the correct step in this case but I'm OK with
reverting the patch until the Exynos DRM driver bug is fixed.

Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: exynos boot falures in linux-next

2014-11-17 Thread Inki Dae
Hello all,

On 2014년 11월 18일 08:25, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
 Hello Kevin,
 
 On 11/17/2014 11:24 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:

 As might have been expected, reverting the change that enables the
 DRM/display options in exynos_defconfig fixes the problem.

 Kevin

 
 I'm sorry for causing a boot failure but when I first posted that patch,
 the Exynos DRM driver was working correctly (at least on the Exynos boards
 I've access to) so it seems the regression was introduced while the patch
 was posted but not yet picked.
 
 I'm not sure what is the correct step in this case but I'm OK with
 reverting the patch until the Exynos DRM driver bug is fixed.

I found out a bug of Exynos DRM, which is infinite loop issue incurred
by -EPROBE_DEFER. I thought that we resolved this issue with some fixups
but not yet. The problem is because -EPROBE_DEFER is returned in case of
adding a component of a crtc device but one of a connector device. I
will fix it up soon.

Thanks for report,
Inki Dae

 
 Best regards,
 Javier
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc 
 in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: exynos boot falures in linux-next

2014-11-17 Thread Kevin Hilman
Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk writes:

 Hello Kevin,

 On 11/17/2014 11:24 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
 
 As might have been expected, reverting the change that enables the
 DRM/display options in exynos_defconfig fixes the problem.
 
 Kevin


 I'm sorry for causing a boot failure but when I first posted that patch,
 the Exynos DRM driver was working correctly (at least on the Exynos boards
 I've access to) 

Yeah, I tested it at the time as well, so I know it was working.

 so it seems the regression was introduced while the patch
 was posted but not yet picked.

 I'm not sure what is the correct step in this case but I'm OK with
 reverting the patch until the Exynos DRM driver bug is fixed.

I didn't have time to dig, but I'd rather someone track down the DRM
problem and fix that, since it was known to be working. I'm guessing
it's something simple that can be fixed before the merge window opens.

Kevin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html