Hello,
On 2014-12-22 18:28, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:12:42AM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
That only leaves the non-DT stuff to worry about this, and from what I
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:00:00PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
I hope I did it right: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/23/158
Please test, because I have no access to Omap hardware.
Patch 1/8 looks like I'd expect it to. Nishanth, please test with your
failing scenario, thanks.
--
FTTC
On 12/23/2014 05:10 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:00:00PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
I hope I did it right: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/23/158
Please test, because I have no access to Omap hardware.
Patch 1/8 looks like I'd expect it to. Nishanth,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:42:48AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
On 2014-12-11 10:29, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:42:33AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
I assume that now it won't be possible to get l2c patches back to -next,
so I will resend them (again...)
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [141222 09:06]:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:42:48AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
On 2014-12-11 10:29, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:42:33AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
I assume that now it won't be possible
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
Nishanth - can we push OMAP over to using the generic DT L2C
initialisation (the one from init_IRQ in arch/arm/kernel/irq.c) and
kill the SoC specific stuff in arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c ?
From
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:12:42AM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
That only leaves the non-DT stuff to worry about this, and from what I
understand, that's going to be removed soon. If we're going to keep
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:42:33AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
I assume that now it won't be possible to get l2c patches back to -next,
so I will resend them (again...) with the omap related fix.
What, you mean you don't know the fundamental rules of kernel development?
No one should ever
On 2014-12-11 10:29, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:42:33AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
I assume that now it won't be possible to get l2c patches back to -next,
so I will resend them (again...) with the omap related fix.
What, you mean you don't know the
Hello,
On 2014-12-09 17:57, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 10:13-20141205, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 12/05/2014 10:10 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
next-20141204 fails to boot, but next-20141203 boots fine with
omap2plus_defconfig.
Panda-ES(4460):
On 10:13-20141205, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 12/05/2014 10:10 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
next-20141204 fails to boot, but next-20141203 boots fine with
omap2plus_defconfig.
Panda-ES(4460):
https://github.com/nmenon/kernel-test-logs/blob/next-20141204/omap2plus_defconfig/pandaboard-es.txt
2014-12-06 1:23 GMT+09:00 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 10:13:51AM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 12/05/2014 10:10 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Case #2: Reverting the following allows boot.
From next-20141204
10df7d5 ARM: 8211/1: l2c: Add support
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 08:54:18PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
2014-12-06 1:23 GMT+09:00 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
Given where we are in the cycle (-final likely this weekend) the only
thing we can do right now is to drop the patch set; exynos (and mvebu)
will have to
On 12/08/2014 06:22 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 08:54:18PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
2014-12-06 1:23 GMT+09:00 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
Given where we are in the cycle (-final likely this weekend) the only
thing we can do right now is to
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 07:54:08AM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 12/08/2014 06:22 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 08:54:18PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
2014-12-06 1:23 GMT+09:00 Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
Given where we are in the cycle
On 12/05/2014 10:10 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
next-20141204 fails to boot, but next-20141203 boots fine with
omap2plus_defconfig.
Panda-ES(4460):
https://github.com/nmenon/kernel-test-logs/blob/next-20141204/omap2plus_defconfig/pandaboard-es.txt
Panda(4430):
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 10:13:51AM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 12/05/2014 10:10 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Case #2: Reverting the following allows boot.
From next-20141204
10df7d5 ARM: 8211/1: l2c: Add support for overriding prefetch settings
revert this - boot still fails
17 matches
Mail list logo
