Hello,
On Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:40 PM Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:15:21 +0200
Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote:
On some Samsung SoCs not all SDHCI controllers have card detect (CD)
line. For some embedded designs it is not even needed, because ususally
This patch prepares CPUFREQ support for S5PV210 by adding definitions
for S5P_VA_DMCx accessed by CPUFREQ, which were not defined previously.
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham myungjoo@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c |
Two issues are addressed for max8998_set_voltage function.
1. Min/Max Voltage.
max8998_set_voltage had been using the voltage value of
min ( voltage[i] = max_vol , i )
This is corrected to use:
min ( voltage[i] = min_vol , i )
2. Ramp Up Delay.
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 05:09:20PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
Two issues are addressed for max8998_set_voltage function.
Acked-by: Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Ideally you should've submitted this as two separate patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hello,
On Friday, July 16, 2010 10:09 AM MyungJoo Ham wrote:
Two issues are addressed for max8998_set_voltage function.
1. Min/Max Voltage.
max8998_set_voltage had been using the voltage value of
min ( voltage[i] = max_vol , i )
This is corrected to use:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 05:01:17PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
S5PV210 CPUFREQ Support.
This CPUFREQ may work without PMIC's DVS support. However, it is not
as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not supported in
this version.
Especially in terms of the regulator API usage:
This patch set adds support for Samsung S5PV310/S5PC210. The S5PV310
integrates a ARM Cortex A9 microprocessor with several other peripherals
to support features such as multimedia, storage, graphics and gaming.
The S5PV310 can be used in products such as Netbooks and Mobile devices.
Changes
From: Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com
This patch adds IRQ support for S5PV310.
ARM GIC is installed in S5PV310 instead of VIC which is in every other CPUs
in S5P series. Several irq combiners are used to resolve the lack of irq
lines in current implementation.
Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn
From: Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com
This patch adds clock and pll support for S5PV310.
Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/clock.c | 544 +++
From: Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com
This patch adds Samsung SMDKV310 board support file.
Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/Makefile|4 ++
arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/mach-smdkv310.c | 92
From: Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com
This patch adds Samsung's S5PV310/S5PC210 CPU support.
The S5PV310/S5PC210 integrates a ARM Cortex A9 multi-core.
Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Jongpill Lee boyko@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Add camera interface SoC resource definitions and setup code
for FIMC/FB fifo links.
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki s.nawro...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
---
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 05:58:28PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/platsmp.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..9325ac2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/platsmp.c
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
MyungJoo Ham wrote:
CPUFREQ of S5PV210 uses different APLL settings and we provide
such values for CPUFREQ at pll.h. We have been using differently
between EVT0 and EVT1 machines. Although this version of kernel
assumes that the CPU is EVT1, users may use code for EVT0 later.
Note that at
From: Naveen Krishna Ch ch.nav...@samsung.com
This patch adds helper functions for I2C channel 0 and 1, GPIO
configurations for I2C on S5P6440 and support I2C-0/1 devices
on SMDK6440.
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Ch ch.nav...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
---
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
From: Naveen Krishna Ch ch.nav...@samsung.com
This patch is to select support I2C channels 0, 1 and 2 for S5PV210 and
S5P6440.
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Ch ch.nav...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim
-Original Message-
From: Maurus Cuelenaere [mailto:mcuelena...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 3:36 PM
To: Sylwester Nawrocki
Cc: 'Kukjin Kim'; Pawel Osciak; Marek Szyprowski;
kyungmin.p...@samsung.com; linux-me...@vger.kernel.org; linux-samsung-
s...@vger.kernel.org;
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
MyungJoo Ham wrote:
CPUFREQ of S5PV210 uses different APLL settings and we provide
such values for CPUFREQ at pll.h. We have been using differently
between EVT0 and EVT1 machines. Although this version of kernel
assumes
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
MyungJoo Ham wrote:
CPUFREQ of S5PV210 uses different APLL settings and we provide
such values for CPUFREQ at pll.h. We have been using differently
between EVT0 and EVT1 machines. Although this version of kernel
assumes
To Ben,
Now you are working on make a single kernel for s5p series at your git.
The v310 or c210 chip also included in these works.
Previous time Marek sent the mail if you are busy with other works, he
can help it.
Give your opinions.
TO Changhwan or Kukjin
Did you see the ben's work? If
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Kyungmin Park
kyungmin.p...@samsung.com wrote:
I don't say LSI need to support early chip. you focus on the your selected
SoC.
The remaining will be done by us.
Of course, you can do whatever you want.
I only worry that this mindless rush to push support for
21 matches
Mail list logo