RE: [PATCH v3] Samsung: sdhci-s3c: add support for new card detection methods

2010-07-16 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hello, On Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:40 PM Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:15:21 +0200 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote: On some Samsung SoCs not all SDHCI controllers have card detect (CD) line. For some embedded designs it is not even needed, because ususally

[PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: S5PV210: add DMCx access virtual address

2010-07-16 Thread MyungJoo Ham
This patch prepares CPUFREQ support for S5PV210 by adding definitions for S5P_VA_DMCx accessed by CPUFREQ, which were not defined previously. Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham myungjoo@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com --- arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c |

[PATCH] regulator: MAX8998: set_voltage bugfix. ramp_up delay and min/max voltage

2010-07-16 Thread MyungJoo Ham
Two issues are addressed for max8998_set_voltage function. 1. Min/Max Voltage. max8998_set_voltage had been using the voltage value of min ( voltage[i] = max_vol , i ) This is corrected to use: min ( voltage[i] = min_vol , i ) 2. Ramp Up Delay.

Re: [PATCH] regulator: MAX8998: set_voltage bugfix. ramp_up delay and min/max voltage

2010-07-16 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 05:09:20PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote: Two issues are addressed for max8998_set_voltage function. Acked-by: Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Ideally you should've submitted this as two separate patches. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

RE: [PATCH] regulator: MAX8998: set_voltage bugfix. ramp_up delay and min/max voltage

2010-07-16 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hello, On Friday, July 16, 2010 10:09 AM MyungJoo Ham wrote: Two issues are addressed for max8998_set_voltage function. 1. Min/Max Voltage. max8998_set_voltage had been using the voltage value of min ( voltage[i] = max_vol , i ) This is corrected to use:

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support

2010-07-16 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 05:01:17PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote: S5PV210 CPUFREQ Support. This CPUFREQ may work without PMIC's DVS support. However, it is not as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not supported in this version. Especially in terms of the regulator API usage:

[PATCH v2 0/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add support for Samsung S5PV310 SoC

2010-07-16 Thread Kukjin Kim
This patch set adds support for Samsung S5PV310/S5PC210. The S5PV310 integrates a ARM Cortex A9 microprocessor with several other peripherals to support features such as multimedia, storage, graphics and gaming. The S5PV310 can be used in products such as Netbooks and Mobile devices. Changes

[PATCH v2 4/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add IRQ support

2010-07-16 Thread Kukjin Kim
From: Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com This patch adds IRQ support for S5PV310. ARM GIC is installed in S5PV310 instead of VIC which is in every other CPUs in S5P series. Several irq combiners are used to resolve the lack of irq lines in current implementation. Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn

[PATCH v2 3/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add Clock and PLL support

2010-07-16 Thread Kukjin Kim
From: Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com This patch adds clock and pll support for S5PV310. Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com --- arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/clock.c | 544 +++

[PATCH v2 7/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add Board support file

2010-07-16 Thread Kukjin Kim
From: Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com This patch adds Samsung SMDKV310 board support file. Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com --- arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/Makefile|4 ++ arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/mach-smdkv310.c | 92

[PATCH v2 2/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add new CPU initialization support

2010-07-16 Thread Kukjin Kim
From: Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com This patch adds Samsung's S5PV310/S5PC210 CPU support. The S5PV310/S5PC210 integrates a ARM Cortex A9 multi-core. Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Jongpill Lee boyko@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim

RE: [PATCH 02/10 v2] ARM: Samsung: Add FIMC resource definition and FIMC driver platform helpers

2010-07-16 Thread Kukjin Kim
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: Add camera interface SoC resource definitions and setup code for FIMC/FB fifo links. Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki s.nawro...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com ---

Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add new CPU initialization support

2010-07-16 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 05:58:28PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/platsmp.c new file mode 100644 index 000..9325ac2 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/platsmp.c @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ +/*

RE: [PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: S5P: Added default pll values for APLL 800/1000MHz

2010-07-16 Thread Kukjin Kim
MyungJoo Ham wrote: CPUFREQ of S5PV210 uses different APLL settings and we provide such values for CPUFREQ at pll.h. We have been using differently between EVT0 and EVT1 machines. Although this version of kernel assumes that the CPU is EVT1, users may use code for EVT0 later. Note that at

[PATCH 1/3] ARM: S5P6440: Add support for I2C channel 0 and 1 on SMDK6440

2010-07-16 Thread Kukjin Kim
From: Naveen Krishna Ch ch.nav...@samsung.com This patch adds helper functions for I2C channel 0 and 1, GPIO configurations for I2C on S5P6440 and support I2C-0/1 devices on SMDK6440. Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Ch ch.nav...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com ---

Re: [PATCH 3/3] i2c/busses: Select I2C bus support for S5PV210 and S5P6440.

2010-07-16 Thread Kyungmin Park
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote: From: Naveen Krishna Ch ch.nav...@samsung.com This patch is to select support I2C channels 0, 1 and 2 for S5PV210 and S5P6440. Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Ch ch.nav...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim

RE: [PATCH 01/10 v2] ARM: Samsung: Add FIMC register and platform definitions

2010-07-16 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
-Original Message- From: Maurus Cuelenaere [mailto:mcuelena...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 3:36 PM To: Sylwester Nawrocki Cc: 'Kukjin Kim'; Pawel Osciak; Marek Szyprowski; kyungmin.p...@samsung.com; linux-me...@vger.kernel.org; linux-samsung- s...@vger.kernel.org;

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: S5P: Added default pll values for APLL 800/1000MHz

2010-07-16 Thread Kyungmin Park
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote: MyungJoo Ham wrote: CPUFREQ of S5PV210 uses different APLL settings and we provide such values for CPUFREQ at pll.h. We have been using differently between EVT0 and EVT1 machines. Although this version of kernel assumes

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: S5P: Added default pll values for APLL 800/1000MHz

2010-07-16 Thread Jassi Brar
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote: MyungJoo Ham wrote: CPUFREQ of S5PV210 uses different APLL settings and we provide such values for CPUFREQ at pll.h. We have been using differently between EVT0 and EVT1 machines. Although this version of kernel assumes

Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] ARM: S5PV310: Add new CPU initialization support

2010-07-16 Thread Kyungmin Park
To Ben, Now you are working on make a single kernel for s5p series at your git. The v310 or c210 chip also included in these works. Previous time Marek sent the mail if you are busy with other works, he can help it. Give your opinions. TO Changhwan or Kukjin Did you see the ben's work? If

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: S5P: Added default pll values for APLL 800/1000MHz

2010-07-16 Thread Jassi Brar
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com wrote: I don't say LSI need to support early chip. you focus on the your selected SoC. The remaining will be done by us. Of course, you can do whatever you want. I only worry that this mindless rush to push support for