On 四, 2012-08-16 at 17:11 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This patchset introduces a new generic cooling device based on cpufreq
> that can be used on non-ACPI platforms. As a proof of concept, we have
> drivers for the following platforms using this mechanism now:
>
> * Samsung Exynos (Exyn
On 17 August 2012 12:54, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On 四, 2012-08-16 at 17:11 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>> This patchset introduces a new generic cooling device based on cpufreq
>> that can be used on non-ACPI platforms. As a proof of concept, we have
>> drivers for the following platforms using
Hi Thomas,
Am Donnerstag, 16. August 2012, 17:49:29 schrieb Thomas Abraham:
> Add device tree based discovery support for Samsung's sdhci controller
>
> Cc: Ben Dooks
> Cc: Kukjin Kim
> Cc: Chris Ball
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c | 146
> +
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> On 17 August 2012 12:54, Zhang Rui wrote:
>> On 四, 2012-08-16 at 17:11 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>>> This patchset introduces a new generic cooling device based on cpufreq
>>> that can be used on non-ACPI platforms. As a pro
This patchset introduces a new generic cooling device based on cpufreq
that can be used on non-ACPI platforms. As a proof of concept, we have
drivers for the following platforms using this mechanism now:
* Samsung Exynos (Exynos4 and Exynos5) in the current patchset.
* Freescale i.MX (git://git
This is repost containing the changes suggested by Zhang Rui. Now the
cpufreq current state will be calculated each time instead of earlier
way of returning the cached value.
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
On 17 August 2012 18:59, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This patchset introduces a new generic cooling
