RE: [PATCH] ARM: S5PV210: Fix on SECTION_SIZE_BITS on S5PV210/S5PC110.

2010-07-08 Thread Kukjin Kim
Russell King wrote: On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:01:16AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: Ok...let's suppose the size of section is 32MiB. Physical Mem.Sections . . . . . .

RE: [PATCH] ARM: S5PV210: Fix on SECTION_SIZE_BITS on S5PV210/S5PC110.

2010-07-07 Thread Kukjin Kim
Russell King wrote: On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 08:27:53AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: Russell King wrote: What is the spacing of chunks of memory, and minimum alignment of those chunks in physical address space? Some S5PC110(MCP D-type) has only available 80MiB in a bank. So the space

Re: [PATCH] ARM: S5PV210: Fix on SECTION_SIZE_BITS on S5PV210/S5PC110.

2010-07-06 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:36:47PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110. Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110 is aligned by 16MB. So each section's maximum size should be 16MB. What is the spacing of chunks of memory, and

Re: [PATCH] ARM: S5PV210: Fix on SECTION_SIZE_BITS on S5PV210/S5PC110.

2010-07-06 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. Kukjin Kim wrote: This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110. Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110 is aligned by 16MB. So each section's maximum size should be 16MB. Reported-by: Kyongho Cho pullip@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim

RE: [PATCH] ARM: S5PV210: Fix on SECTION_SIZE_BITS on S5PV210/S5PC110.

2010-07-06 Thread Kukjin Kim
Sergei Shtylyov wrote: Hello. Hi :-) Kukjin Kim wrote: This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110. Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110 is aligned by 16MB. So each section's maximum size should be 16MB. Reported-by: Kyongho Cho

RE: [PATCH] ARM: S5PV210: Fix on SECTION_SIZE_BITS on S5PV210/S5PC110.

2010-07-06 Thread Kukjin Kim
Kyungmin Park wrote: On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote: This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110. Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110 is aligned by 16MB. So each section's maximum size should be 16MB.

Re: [PATCH] ARM: S5PV210: Fix on SECTION_SIZE_BITS on S5PV210/S5PC110.

2010-07-06 Thread Joonyoung Shim
On 7/7/2010 8:27 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: Russell King wrote: Hi Russell :-) On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:36:47PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110. Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110 is aligned by 16MB. So each

RE: [PATCH] ARM: S5PV210: Fix on SECTION_SIZE_BITS on S5PV210/S5PC110.

2010-07-06 Thread Kukjin Kim
Joonyoung Shim wrote: On 7/7/2010 8:27 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: Russell King wrote: Hi Russell :-) On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:36:47PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110. Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110 is

Re: [PATCH] ARM: S5PV210: Fix on SECTION_SIZE_BITS on S5PV210/S5PC110.

2010-07-06 Thread Kyungmin Park
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote: Russell King wrote: Hi Russell :-) On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:36:47PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110. Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110

Re: [PATCH] ARM: S5PV210: Fix on SECTION_SIZE_BITS on S5PV210/S5PC110.

2010-07-05 Thread Kyungmin Park
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote: This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110. Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110 is aligned by 16MB. So each section's maximum size should be 16MB. Could you explain what's the