Russell King wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:01:16AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Ok...let's suppose the size of section is 32MiB.
Physical Mem.Sections
. .
. .
. .
Russell King wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 08:27:53AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Russell King wrote:
What is the spacing of chunks of memory, and minimum alignment of
those
chunks in physical address space?
Some S5PC110(MCP D-type) has only available 80MiB in a bank.
So the space
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:36:47PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110.
Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110 is aligned by 16MB.
So each section's maximum size should be 16MB.
What is the spacing of chunks of memory, and
Hello.
Kukjin Kim wrote:
This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110.
Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110 is aligned by 16MB.
So each section's maximum size should be 16MB.
Reported-by: Kyongho Cho pullip@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim
Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
Hi :-)
Kukjin Kim wrote:
This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110.
Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110 is aligned by 16MB.
So each section's maximum size should be 16MB.
Reported-by: Kyongho Cho
Kyungmin Park wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110.
Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110 is aligned by 16MB.
So each section's maximum size should be 16MB.
On 7/7/2010 8:27 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Russell King wrote:
Hi Russell :-)
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:36:47PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110.
Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110 is aligned by 16MB.
So each
Joonyoung Shim wrote:
On 7/7/2010 8:27 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Russell King wrote:
Hi Russell :-)
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:36:47PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on
S5PV210/S5PC110.
Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110 is
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Russell King wrote:
Hi Russell :-)
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:36:47PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110.
Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110.
Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110 is aligned by 16MB.
So each section's maximum size should be 16MB.
Could you explain what's the
10 matches
Mail list logo